Could your tracker fund be costing you a small fortune?

The most expensive tracker funds are charging 20 times more than the cheapest alternative, potentially costing investors thousands of pounds over the longer term.

An investor with £10,000 in the most expensive UK stock market tracker fund will pay £106 in investment management fees every year, a huge premium over the estimated cost of £5 per year for the cheapest tracker fund, analysis from investment platform AJ Bell has revealed.

“It might come as a surprise, but not all tracker funds are created equal. There can be a big gulf in charges, and over time this can produce a seriously large dent in your nest egg if you happen to be invested in a higher cost tracker,” explained AJ Bell’s head of investment analysis, Laith Khalaf.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Expensive tracker funds mean investors are being “ripped off”

Bella Caridade-Ferreira, CEO of Fundscape, agrees. "There are trackers out there – Virgin is the worst – where the fees are almost as high as actively managed funds. There’s no active management in a tracker so charging active-like fees for a tracker is simply ripping investors off," she said.

Holding the cheapest tracker fund could leave the investor with a portfolio worth £19,580 after a decade, but just £17,807 if they invested in the priciest instead, a difference of nearly £1,800 - even though both funds deliver identical performance, AJ Bell’s calculations show.

The most expensive tracker funds are often at least 0.2% more expensive than the cheapest option. In some cases they can cost 0.5% or even 1% more than the lowest price alternative tracking the same region.

Source: AJ Bell/Morningstar

The report also highlighted that £10,000 tracking the UK stock market could sacrifice £1,800 in investment returns over a decade by holding the priciest fund.  

Another way to look at it is an investor holding a mixed portfolio across seven of the main investment sectors across global equity markets could be almost £9,000 better off over 10 years, based on a £100,000 investment, according to the company.

Caridade-Ferreira explained that investors assume that all trackers are cheap, but they should compare providers and make sure they’re getting the best possible price. “Fidelity and Vanguard are among the cheapest in the market and investors should always include them in their comparisons,” she said.

How tracker funds work

Tracker funds, also known as Passive funds, track a particular part of the global stock market, often a region like UK, US or European companies. Naturally, this means that people with passive funds have no opportunity to outperform the stock market.

Conversely, actively managed funds aim to outperform the market by picking and choosing which stocks to hold and normally cost more as a result.

Khalaf added that with no chance of outperformance because they invest passively, the difference in returns between comparable tracker funds will be largely dictated by fees. “It therefore makes sense for investors to seek to reduce costs where possible, and sometimes this means voting with your feet and transferring to a new provider.”

Platforms restricted from telling investors about savings

Some of today’s most expensive trackers may have first been purchased by investors many years ago and originally priced with an ‘all-in’ fee covering investment, administration and any financial advice received at the time.

However, these funds are no longer perceived as good value with their costs rising after being moved to modern investment platforms since that time.

This means that while a tracker fund may have been good value when they were taken up, that may no longer be the case and it is likely investors could switch to cheaper funds.

What makes it more complicated for investors is they may not even be aware of this and  investment platforms are not allowed to tell them.

Current rules mean that, were investment platforms to notify investors about possible cost savings on passive holdings in their portfolio, they may be deemed to have provided financial advice.

However, this could change. “The regulator is currently reviewing the dividing line between advice and guidance, and this is an example of how relaxing the rules could help investors to make better, more informed decisions,” said Khalaf.