Could colour diamonds add a sparkle to your portfolio?
Diamonds of various shades never go out of fashion, says Chris Carter
The rock now gracing Taylor Swift’s finger, along with US president Donald Trump’s doubling of tariffs on goods from India, has given a welcome boost to the diamond industry. Swift’s engagement lifted the shares in some listed jewellery retailers, while India cuts and polishes most of the world’s diamonds – and Americans are the biggest consumers of diamond jewellery, as Jinjoo Lee notes in The Wall Street Journal. But the lift to diamond prices is unlikely to last much longer than Swift’s wedding cake. That’s because the rise of an almost unlimited supply of synthetic colourless diamonds has tarnished the industry. Colour diamonds, on the other hand, have proved much more resistant.
That’s down to a number of factors, not least of which is the rarity of colour diamonds relative to colourless ones. Only around 0.01% of gem-quality mined diamonds are colour diamonds of the “fancy” type (a measure of the intensity of colour in the Gemological Institute of America [GIA] grading system). They are vanishingly rare. And, naturally, every single one is a little bit different, not only because of the varying sizes, hues, tones and saturations, but also because of the presence of imperfections within the diamonds, known as “inclusions”. So, tracking valuations for colour diamonds is tricky. But with that caveat in mind, prices for fancy colour diamonds have grown at a compound annual rate of 5.7% a year for the past two decades, according to the Fancy Color Research Foundation (FCRF).
How much has the most expensive colour diamond sold for?
This summer, a 10.38-carat pink diamond once owned by Duchess Marie-Thérèse d’Angoulême, the only surviving child of the ill-fated French queen Marie Antoinette, sold for almost $14 million with Christie’s in New York. The record of the most expensive colour diamond ever sold at auction also belongs to a pink gem – the 59.60-carat Pink Star, which fetched $71.2 million with Sotheby’s in Hong Kong in 2017. These prices are not surprising when you consider the lengths to which nature has gone to make them.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Diamonds are created under immense pressure deep underground over millions, if not billions, of years. Yellow diamonds – the most common, although still incredibly rare – contain nitrogen, while blue diamonds contain boron and black diamonds graphite. But pink diamonds get their colour not from impurities, but from the extra stresses they received during their formation that altered their lattice crystal structure. The same goes for red diamonds, which are really just an extension along the colour scale of pink diamonds. They are the rarest of all, and only a handful exist in the world. And since the closure of Rio Tinto’s Argyll mine in Australia in 2020 – which had been responsible for 90% of the world’s supply of newly mined pink diamonds – no more or very few are now coming onto the market. Small wonder, then, that, last month, police in Dubai arrested a gang of thieves who had gone to great lengths to steal a 21.5-carat pink diamond. It had been valued at $25 million.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

-
Pundits had a bad 2025 – here's what it means for investorsThe pundits came in for many shocks in 2025, says Max King. Here is what they should learn from them
-
The MoneyWeek ETF portfolio – early 2026 updateThe MoneyWeek ETF portfolio had a solid year in 2025 and looks well placed for what the next 12 months may bring
-
Pundits had a bad 2025 – here's what it means for investorsThe pundits came in for many shocks in 2025, says Max King. Here is what they should learn from them
-
The MoneyWeek ETF portfolio – early 2026 updateThe MoneyWeek ETF portfolio had a solid year in 2025 and looks well placed for what the next 12 months may bring
-
'Investors should brace for Trump’s great inflation'Opinion Donald Trump's actions against Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell will likely stoke rising prices. Investors should prepare for the worst, says Matthew Lynn
-
The state of Iran’s collapsing economy – and why people are protestingIran has long been mired in an economic crisis that is part of a wider systemic failure. Do the protests show a way out?
-
The rise and fall of Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela's ruthless dictatorNicolás Maduro is known for getting what he wants out of any situation. That might be a challenge now
-
Polar Capital: a cheap, leveraged play on technologyPolar Capital has carved out a niche in fund management and is reaping the benefits
-
Vaccines inject billions into Big Pharma – how to profit from the sectorThe vaccines subsector received a big fillip from Covid, but its potential extends far beyond combating pandemics. Here's what it means for investors
-
'Investors should keep putting their trust in investment trusts'Interview Peter Walls, manager of the Unicorn Mastertrust fund, analyses investment trusts in a conversation with Andrew Van Sickle