What tougher rules for banks holding cryptocurrencies could mean for investors
Banks holding cryptocurrencies may have to set aside much higher levels of capital to reflect the growing risks of holding them. Saloni Sardana looks at what's proposed and what it could mean for the crypto market.
Banks holding cryptocurrencies may have to set aside much higher levels of capital to reflect the growing risks of holding them, global regulators said this week.
The recommendations came as part of a consultation report released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, which sets global standards for the regulation of banks.
The report called crypto assets an “immature asset class” that pose several major risks to banks, including credit risk; market risk; operational risk (including fraud and cyber risks); money laundering and terrorist financing risk; and legal and reputation risks.
What is the Basel Committee proposing?
The committee is proposing to divide cryptocurrencies into two different groups.
The first group proposes placing tokenised assets and stablecoins under the existing Basel Framework with some modifications and guidance. It proposes regulating them in the same way as other financial instruments such as loans, deposits, equities, bonds. “Tokenised assets” are simply blockchain tokens whose value is tied to a real asset, such as gold. Stablecoins are a similar concept, but are specifically tied to fiat currencies.
As such, the regulators perceive both tokenised assets and stablecoins to be slightly more “stable” compared to the likes of bitcoin and other digital currencies.
The second category involves subjecting cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin to a “new conservative prudential treatment”, the statement said, which would apply a 1,250% risk weighting to the banks’ exposure to digital currencies. This means that banks may have to hold a dollar of capital for every dollar held in bitcoin, so a $100 exposure to bitcoin would result in a capital requirement of $100.
However, after the announcement, bitcoin rose briefly to more than $38,000, which implies that markets had been expecting tougher action.
Also while regulators are clamping down on the still immature crypto market, the tougher rules also suggest they are slowly starting to perceive crypto as an asset class, something which lent support to the market.
Denis Vinokourov, head of research at Synergia Capital, echoes this point: “as cryptocurrencies begin to make their way into the traditional financial ecosystem, it is only normal to expect various regulatory bodies to begin to set and then also try to coordinate regulatory initiatives to protect savers and investors”, Vinokourov told CoinDesk.
Crypto markets have weakened in recent weeks, due to a bout of bad news – regulatory clampdowns by countries such as China, and a series of U-turns by Tesla’s Elon Musk, who is known in some circles as “the Federal Reserve of the crypto world”.
So if crypto prices were creeping downwards anyway, then why is the Basel committee worried about banks’ exposure to crypto?
Governments have been getting nervous about cryptocurrencies for a while
Crypto markets have spent much of the last few months hitting record after record. Much of it had to do with greater mainstream adoption by banks such as BNY Mellon and Goldman Sachs and a series of bullish statements by Elon Musk.
Tesla said it bought $1.5bn worth of bitcoin in February and later announced it started accepting bitcoin as a form of payment for its cars. The listing of Coinbase – America’s largest cryptocurrency exchange – in April also lent support to the crypto market.
But Musk backtracked on his love for bitcoin and last month said Tesla would no longer accept it because of concerns of high electricity usage in bitcoin “mining”, the process by which new cryptocurrency units are created.
This came just days after China banned its institutions from providing cryptocurrency services, and banned bitcoin mining in the country.
The rise in cryptocurrencies has alarmed regulators and many countries such as China, the US, Japan, the UK, to name a few are looking at launching central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), their response to a cashless economy. Countries are unlikely to want competition to their own CBDCs.
Bitcoin has lost more than 30% in a month. But even with this, it is up 30% since the start of the year and is trading below $38,000, at the time of writing.
So given bitcoin and some digital currencies were falling anyway, should investors care about the Basel proposals?
What this means for digital currencies and investors
The Basel Committee suggestions are “a piece of news that both advocates and critics of bitcoin will declare as a win”, says Luke Sully, chief executive of Legermatic.
On one hand investors may rejoice in the fact that bitcoin is now a recognised asset class, but the more onerous capital requirements may “make it an unpalatable business” for banks. So if it is going to cost banks more to hold cryptocurrencies, they may theoretically hold less.
But at the same time, perhaps these recommendations – if realised – could be a turning point where regulators are giving banks the green light to get involved, in a safer way, albeit at a higher cost.
Nigel Green, chief executive of advisory company deVere Group shares the same view, saying that the the tough stance “would further help protect investors, shore-up the market, tackle criminality, and reduce the potential possibility of disrupting global financial stability, as well as offering a potential long-term boost to those banks that introduce it”, he said.
For investors, it’s still probably worth paying attention to the sector – the market is growing and it could be said that regulators caring about it enough to propose safer ways for banks to hold them is evidence of the market maturing. But remember that putting money into bitcoin – or any other digital currency – remains a highly speculative punt.