Jerome Powell’s poisoned chalice
US president Joe Biden has nominated Jerome Powell for a second term in charge of the Federal Reserve. But it could prove a “poisoned chalice” for Powell. Here's why.

US president Joe Biden has nominated Jerome Powell for a second term in charge of the Federal Reserve, ending weeks of speculation about the future direction of the world’s most important central bank. Left-wing democrats had pushed for Lael Brainard, a member of the Fed’s board of governors who has taken a tough stance on financial regulation, to succeed Powell, a Republican, in the post. Biden has instead nominated Brainard to be vice chair, keeping Powell in place for another four years. Powell will face confirmation hearings in the Senate before his new term begins in February 2022.
Biden has made the right call, says Bloomberg. The Fed needs continuity as it conducts the delicate task of unwinding crisis-era monetary policy. A new boss would have raised the risk of miscommunication and market upsets. While Brainard takes a stronger line on financial regulation, the pair don’t seem to have any major disagreements about monetary policy. The risk was rather that Brainard, a Democrat, would have been perceived as “partisan”. The last thing the Fed needs is to get sucked into febrile party-political spats.
Powell’s second term could prove a “poisoned chalice”, says Desmond Lachman for The Hill. Last year he threw the kitchen sink at financial markets to stave off disaster from the pandemic. That has helped send US inflation up to 6.2%, the highest in three decades. US stocks are at valuations “experienced only once before in the past 100 years”. That will put Powell in a bind next year: either he lets price rises rip – and goes down as the Fed chair who presided over the return of inflation – or he raises interest rates earlier than expected, bursting the asset-price bubble.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Fool me twice?
Meanwhile in the UK, Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey is “beginning to look beleaguered”, says Martin Vander Weyer in The Spectator. He appeared to suggest interest rates would rise earlier this month, only to surprise traders when they didn’t. The incident caused unnecessary market turmoil. “There’s nothing wrong with ambiguity so long as markets are convinced the central bank is ahead of the game. But in this case the governor just looked lame… and the Bank’s authority… correspondingly diminished”.
After betting wrongly on an interest rate hike in November, markets are pricing in a hike at the Bank’s next meeting on 16 December. One of the reasons the Bank held interest rates at 0.1% was because it was waiting to see what impact the end of the furlough scheme would have on employment. Strong employment data since then has allayed those concerns, while news that annual UK inflation hit 4.2% in October has raised the odds of a hike. It remains to be seen whether the Monetary Policy Committee will disappoint markets a second time.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Alex is an investment writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2015. He has been the magazine’s markets editor since 2019.
Alex has a passion for demystifying the often arcane world of finance for a general readership. While financial media tends to focus compulsively on the latest trend, the best opportunities can lie forgotten elsewhere.
He is especially interested in European equities – where his fluent French helps him to cover the continent’s largest bourse – and emerging markets, where his experience living in Beijing, and conversational Chinese, prove useful.
Hailing from Leeds, he studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at the University of Oxford. He also holds a Master of Public Health from the University of Manchester.
-
Could investing in sugar protect you during a downturn?
Sugar has some defensive qualities during economic downturns, but is now the right time to invest in sugar?
By Dan McEvoy
-
Trump’s tariffs: how should the UK respond?
Every right-thinking person knows that free trade is a surer route to the wealth of nations than protectionism. So, what is Trump thinking?
By Stuart Watkins
-
Trump’s tariffs: what is he thinking and how should the UK respond?
Every right-thinking person knows that free trade is a surer route to the wealth of nations than protectionism. So, what is Trump thinking?
By Stuart Watkins
-
Why stagflation now seems like America's "optimistic scenario"
Investors have gone into tariff shock, and stagflation could now be the optimistic scenario for the US economy.
By Alex Rankine
-
Will Trump force the Fed to lower interest rates?
Opinion Markets are ignoring the risk that Donald Trump forces the central bank into reckless interest rate cuts
By Cris Sholto Heaton
-
What is the Mar-a-Lago Accord and why is it getting attention from Wall Street?
On Wall Street, there is talk that Trump's tariffs aim to make the world’s leaders come crawling to Mar-a-Lago, his Florida residence
By Alex Rankine
-
Donald Trump's tariffs spark a global game of thrones
We don’t know what Donald Trump intends or will do next. That is in itself damaging.
By Emily Hohler
-
What does Big Tech's alliance with Donald Trump mean for the US?
The alliance between Big Tech and the new US president Trump is causing concern
By Emily Hohler
-
Is the US economy set for success?
Ignore the pessimists: US stocks will keep charging ahead, says Max King
By Max King
-
Will Trump's tariffs trigger high inflation in the US?
The incoming Trump administration will continue Biden's protectionist and fiscally loose economic policies, while the Middle East looks more dangerous than ever
By Philip Pilkington