Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Twice daily
MoneyWeek
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Four times a week
Look After My Bills
Sign up to our free money-saving newsletter, filled with the latest news and expert advice to help you find the best tips and deals for managing your bills. Start saving today!
The blunders, mishaps and poor performance of the current government have led to nostalgia for the golden years of New Labour under Tony Blair. In reality, Blair’s government made decisions that have proved extremely damaging in the long term, sowing the seeds of Britain’s subsequent poor performance and many of its current problems. Here are my top ten.
1. Selling 40% of Britain’s gold reserves
The policy was announced in May 1999 with the gold price at $282 an ounce and completed in March 2002. The average price achieved was $275, compared with a current price of $4,800. The opportunity cost of the 12.7 million ounces sold was $57.5billion.
2. Windfall tax
Labour’s first Budget included a £5billion “windfall” tax on the businesses privatised under the Conservative government, a programme that the Labour Party had consistently opposed despite the appalling record of these businesses in the public sector.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
This tax on the businesses, rather than on the investors who had profited from underpriced flotations – combined with the castigation of the bosses of the privatised businesses and regulation intended to favour lower prices at the expense of investment – drove most of the utilities into the hands of unaccountable, often overseas, private equity.
3. Tax raid on pension funds
Labour's first budget raised £5billion a year by abolishing advance corporation tax (ACT). Until then, UK-listed companies had deducted the standard rate of income tax from gross dividends and paid the resulting amount to the Inland Revenue as ACT. The ACT paid was credited against the company’s mainstream corporation tax and investors (such as pension funds) that were not liable for income tax could claim the tax back.
Abolition discouraged pension funds from investing in UK equities, severely undermined final-salary schemes in the private sector and significantly increased pension costs to businesses. The result was the relentless decline in the London Stock Exchange as a source of capital for British businesses.
The bankrupting of British Energy
4. Bankrupting British Energy
The government made a concerted effort to close down nuclear-power generation in the UK, largely because of the industry’s role in undermining the effectiveness of the coal miners’ strike in 1984.
Nuclear-power generation was struggling to compete with gas-fired generation due to a glut of gas and the government made this worse by piling other financial obligations on British Energy. It was forced to sell assets at knockdown prices in the UK and Canada and a lucrative fuel-reprocessing business was shut down.
The destruction of industrial expertise, the crippling of a viable domestic nuclear generator and the heaping of excessive “safety” requirements on the remaining plants has made it eye-wateringly expensive to build new nuclear plants at Hinkley Point and Sizewell.
5. Railtrack
Labour had hated rail privatisation and used the excuse of a rail crash at Hatfield in 2000 to take control of Railtrack, which owned the infrastructure. As a nationalised industry, its safety record had been poor, not least because British Rail had a policy of replacing only 1% of its track each year, a strategy embedded into Railtrack’s financial model at privatisation.
When privatisation brought a reversal in the long decline of rail usage, the problem of underinvestment became critical. Renationalisation brought a massive increase in the cost of investment projects, chaotic management and relentless political involvement – but for which HS2 would have been completed long ago at a far lower cost.
6. Abolishing GP fundholding
Reforms in the 1990s turned the NHS upside down, enabling general practitioners (GPs) to decide which hospitals their patients were sent to for treatment. This was resented by hospital doctors and consultants, who looked down on GPs, and also by the Labour Party, which preferred a centralised, top-down structure.
The system wasn’t perfect, but it cut waiting times, improved patient care and facilitated significant gains in productivity. Labour abolished the system and put centralised commissioning agencies in charge, rather than the GPs who knew their patients and where to send them. For the subsequent 25 years, NHS productivity stagnated at best.
7. Throwing money at the NHS
Blair’s government thought that the only problem with the NHS was that it was underfunded. So it significantly increased the organisation’s funding without any attempt to get value for money. Now, little more than half the 1.4 million full-time equivalents employed by the NHS are clinical.
At least the extension of the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) meant that, for a change, hospitals (and other public-sector projects) were built or rebuilt on time and on budget and properly maintained. However, a financial squeeze on the private -sector provision of care homes after Labour’s election has meant that the number of residential places has fallen from 520,000 in 1998 to 440,000, despite an ageing population.
8. Over-expansion of higher education
The government had the noble ambition to increase access to higher education to half the population. But it didn’t think through the consequences. This led to a ratcheting up of course fees financed by student loans at what are now usurious rates of interest. Outstanding student debt now totals £255billion; £30billion is expected to be written off each year by the end of the 2040s.
Meanwhile, the gap between graduate and non-graduate salaries has fallen sharply, while many jobs are no longer open to non-graduates. Moreover, professions requiring long years of study, such as medicine, put a ruinous financial burden on their practitioners.
9. Handing back part of the EU rebate
In 1984, Margaret Thatcher negotiated a 66% rebate of Britain’s net contribution to the EU, in recognition of its low call on funds in the Common Agricultural Policy. As a goodwill gesture to the EU, Blair reduced the rebate by £7billion; not significant in itself, but it irritated EU-sceptics in the UK. Arguably, it also gave the EU the impression that the UK would always fold in negotiations, so it felt no need to make concessions before the Brexit vote.
10. Poor crisis management
The global financial crisis blew up after Blair had resigned, but Blair must bear some responsibility for the credit-fuelled growth that led to it and for keeping Gordon Brown as his chancellor, enabling him to become prime minister. In 2007, Brown mistook the liquidity crisis at Northern Rock for a solvency crisis, undermining confidence in the banking system. Lloyds Bank was bullied into bailing out HBOS, critically undermining its own viability. And while the US government made a huge profit from rescuing the financial system, the UK didn’t.
Despite Blair’s abysmal record, David Cameron was happy to be regarded as “the heir to Blair” and did little to reverse the damage. As a result, the UK economy has persistently underperformed its pre-2008 trend path of growth, hampered by structural problems in both the public and private sectors. It may be possible to correct these and return the UK to the path it was once on, but only if the mistakes dating back to 1997 are first recognised.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.

Max has an Economics degree from the University of Cambridge and is a chartered accountant. He worked at Investec Asset Management for 12 years, managing multi-asset funds investing in internally and externally managed funds, including investment trusts. This included a fund of investment trusts which grew to £120m+. Max has managed ten investment trusts (winning many awards) and sat on the boards of three trusts – two directorships are still active.
After 39 years in financial services, including 30 as a professional fund manager, Max took semi-retirement in 2017. Max has been a MoneyWeek columnist since 2016 writing about investment funds and more generally on markets online, plus occasional opinion pieces. He also writes for the Investment Trust Handbook each year and has contributed to The Daily Telegraph and other publications. See here for details of current investments held by Max.
-
Inheritance tax investigations net HMRC an extra £246m from bereaved familiesHMRC embarked on almost 4,000 probes into unpaid inheritance tax in the year to last April, new figures show, in an increasingly tough crackdown on families it thinks have tried to evade their full bill
-
Average UK house price reaches £300,000 for first time, Halifax saysWhile the average house price has topped £300k, regional disparities still remain, Halifax finds.
-
How a dovish Federal Reserve could affect youTrump’s pick for the US Federal Reserve is not so much of a yes-man as his rival, but interest rates will still come down quickly, says Cris Sholto Heaton
-
New Federal Reserve chair Kevin Warsh has his work cut outOpinion Kevin Warsh must make it clear that he, not Trump, is in charge at the Fed. If he doesn't, the US dollar and Treasury bills sell-off will start all over again
-
How Canada's Mark Carney is taking on Donald TrumpCanada has been in Donald Trump’s crosshairs ever since he took power and, under PM Mark Carney, is seeking strategies to cope and thrive. How’s he doing?
-
Rachel Reeves is rediscovering the Laffer curveOpinion If you keep raising taxes, at some point, you start to bring in less revenue. Rachel Reeves has shown the way, says Matthew Lynn
-
The enshittification of the internet and what it means for usWhy do transformative digital technologies start out as useful tools but then gradually get worse and worse? There is a reason for it – but is there a way out?
-
What turns a stock market crash into a financial crisis?Opinion Professor Linda Yueh's popular book on major stock market crashes misses key lessons, says Max King
-
ISA reforms will destroy the last relic of the Thatcher eraOpinion With the ISA under attack, the Labour government has now started to destroy the last relic of the Thatcher era, returning the economy to the dysfunctional 1970s
-
Why does Trump want Greenland?The US wants to annex Greenland as it increasingly sees the world in terms of 19th-century Great Power politics and wants to secure crucial national interests