The £3.6 billion, 370p a share takeover of International Distribution Services (IDS), the owner of Royal Mail, by a company owned by Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky has passed a review prompted by concern over national security, says Jasper Jolly in The Guardian. This means that Royal Mail, which can be traced back to 1516, will be controlled by an overseas owner for the first time. In return, the state will retain a “golden share” in IDS, so any changes to Royal Mail’s ownership, tax residency or headquarters will need its assent. Royal Mail has also agreed to uphold the universal service obligation for first-class mail for at least the next six years.
In addition to securing the support of the government, Kretinsky also seems to have won over the unions, which are now praising the deal as a “fresh start”, says James Warrington in The Daily Telegraph. Staff have been promised 10% of any dividends paid out to Kretinsky, as well as a greater say in how the company is run through “a new workers’ group that will meet with bosses once a month”. He also says there will be no compulsory redundancies until any reforms to Royal Mail’s universal service obligation have been made.
Royal Mail takeover: reasons for scepticism?
Getting the green light from the government and an agreement in principle with unions “clears some of the biggest hurdles” for Kretinsky’s efforts to buy Royal Mail, says Russ Mould of AJ Bell. While technically shareholders “still need to vote on the takeover”, logic suggests that any opposing shareholders “would already have expressed their dissatisfaction by now”. After all, while some have suggested that IDS’s overseas parcels arm is worth at least 350p per share, there “are no alternative bids on the table”, which suggest shareholders “might be ready to take the money and move on”. But there are valid reasons to be sceptical, says Alex Brummer in the Daily Mail. Far from “strengthening a misfiring company”, the takeover “would weaken the group’s finances”. It is particularly hard to see how Kretinsky can honour promises to unions and the government on jobs and investment while taking on an additional £3 billion of extra leverage. What’s more, the record of foreign indebted takeovers has generally been “depressing”, with Thames Water “up to its neck in sewage and borrowings”, while the swift private-equity break-up of aerospace group Cobham “has been detrimental to Britain’s defences”.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
No matter how good Kretinsky is at turning around the “underperforming” Royal Mail business, the underlying decline in the number of letters sent means that it will still be under pressure, says Hargreaves Lansdown’s Susannah Streeter. The success of the deal will therefore depend on long-term changes to the universal service obligation, especially concerning second-class mail, which would allow the firm to “right-size infrastructure to reflect the modern-day reality”. While the regulator is carrying out a review, any major reforms are “likely to be a long time coming”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Tariff day: what to expect from Trump’s ‘Liberation Day'Donald Trump's tariff day is fast approaching. What does it mean for global markets and your money?
-
Is the stock market open on Easter?Will your stocks bloom during Easter? We look at the UK stock market opening times over the spring holiday period
-
London can lure Brexit-fleeing banks back to UK – but the City must move quicklyOpinion Many banks fled to Paris in the wake of Brexit but are now in full-scale retreat. The City should move quickly to lure them back, says Matthew Lynn
-
Spring Statement: Rachel Reeves 'must turn good intentions into effective measures'Opinion Chancellor Rachel Reeves understands the economy’s structural problems but is unlikely to solve them, says Max King
-
England's department stores return – but do they have a future?Opinion The great traditional retail shops of Middle England have bounced back for now. Don’t get too carried away though, says Matthew Lynn
-
Labour's 'Project Chainsaw' begins by abolishing NHS England – will it backfire?Keir Starmer is taking the fight to the blockers, the NIMBYs, public sector workers and the unions says Emily Hohler. What happens if Labour fails to deliver?
-
Walgreens Boots Alliance sold to private equity firm - will Boots get the boot?US pharmacy giant Walgreens Boots Alliance is going private. Will the new owners sell off the high-street chemist?
-
Prosus to buy Just Eat for €4.1 billion as takeaway boom fadesFood-delivery platform Just Eat has been gobbled up by a Dutch rival. Now there could be further consolidation in the sector
-
Is Rachel Reeves leading the UK to a spring crisis?Opinion Rachel Reeves is sleepwalking into an economic catastrophe of her own making. Don’t expect a change of direction, says Matthew Lynn
-
Filtronic: A British stock reaching for the starsOpinion British stock Filtronic’s explosive growth is only just getting started
