This article was first published in MoneyWeek magazine issue no 984 on 31 January 2020. To make sure you don't miss out in future, sign up to MoneyWeek here and get your first six issues free.
Despite the thumping majority delivered to Boris Johnson just a few weeks ago, he knows that he cannot afford to rest on his laurels. Within hours of his victory he was quick to thank those who “may only have lent us your vote”; where “your hand may have quivered over the ballot paper before you put your cross in the Conservative box”. He now has up to five years to convince these people to stick with him. How will he do it?
To start with, he must, as he promised, “Get Brexit Done”. The easy part will be achieved when the UK officially exits the European Union (EU) at 11pm on the day this magazine hits your doormat. But it won’t look like we have left, given that the implementation period preserves the status quo for the following 11 months. To convince voters that he has delivered, Johnson will need to show that the UK has taken back control of its borders, its money and its institutions of government. This will be tricky, to say the least. Not only because he now enters a complex negotiating period with the EU – whereby compromise will be part of the inevitable conclusion – but also because this next phase will be weighed down by tortuous details and legal jargon. If voters felt the Irish Backstop was complicated, let’s see how they feel about how rules of origin affect just-in-time supply management chains. Your eyes are no doubt glazing over even as you read that sentence.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Get 6 issues free
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
This Brexit fatigue is exactly what the PM wants. He has reportedly forbidden ministers from using “the B-word” and won’t mind a jot if it moves from the front pages to the business pages of the newspapers. The less it’s spoken about, the more voters will move on. Instead, he will drive forward the narrative of an open Britain, moving onwards and upwards as it embraces new trade agreements and a fresh domestic economic strategy. The Budget will become the B-word that matters. On 11 March, Chancellor Sajid Javid will be able to deliver a radically new fiscal direction for the country. His predecessor Philip Hammond declared an end to the age of austerity; Javid can introduce a new era of infrastructure investment. Johnson loves a big project. With interest rates low and (some) fiscal headroom, he can build new bridges or train tracks. He can be bold. His budget will sail through, not only thanks to that huge majority, but also because it will still be Jeremy Corbyn at the opposite despatch box. Labour’s new leader won’t take over until April. There is no opposition to anything Johnson wants to do.
The tricky balancing act facing Johnson
Except, of course, when it comes to those pesky negotiations with the EU over our future relationship. Alignment to EU rules would be less economically disruptive in the short term; but without divergence, Johnson will struggle to make the key argument that the UK has indeed taken back control. Can he deliver enough of a fiscal boost to buffer the economy from a disruptive departure at the end of this year? Will the Bank of England play its part with monetary stimulus?
Even if he gets an economic boost, it must be one that helps those voters who lent him their votes. Those citizens, who are based in areas which have struggled in recent times, might not be too happy if, for example, a huge employer in the area decides to up sticks and quit the UK because it has diverged too far from EU rules. We might all glaze over at the mention of legal jargon – but nothing hits home like job losses.
The framing of the debate
And so the final part of Johnson’s political strategy falls to his right-hand man, arch-campaigner, Dominic Cummings. Economic pain can be taken if it’s in the pursuit of an ideological goal. Just look at people who voted for Scottish independence – their decision was motivated by their sense of identity, rather than by GDP statistics. Even if Johnson can’t keep the economy buoyant, he can still keep voters onside if they feel he’s acting as their champion.
Last year, we had “The People vs Parliament”. Johnson needs a new bogeyman for the next battle. Step forward the EU. If it can be shown that they are the aggressors, attempting to bully Britain into unacceptable compromises, then Johnson can once again stand up for the common man. If he can’t get economic growth, then he can use this outrage to once again power him to victory at the ballot box.
This is why the Withdrawal Agreement Bill contained a line to the effect that “no Minister of the Crown will accept an extension to the 31 December 2020 deadline for a free trade agreement”. Under the terms of the agreement, both the UK and EU must mutually consent to extend this deadline by 1 July 2020. But now, it’s written into UK law that the government can’t do that. If the EU seeks to change that, the headlines will shriek that “the EU are trying to tell us what to do even after we’ve left!” and so on. So the plan for Johnson is clear: Get Brexit Done, get growth, and if all else fails, get Britain angry. If he can achieve that, he will be back as prime minister in the next election.
For more from Helen, visit blondemoney.co.uk
MPs warn over Lifetime ISAs which could leave savers out of pocket
FCA reveals 'once in a generation' advice changes - what the reforms mean for you
