An awful lot of people want an awful lot of things from the public purse this summer. The UK’s job-furlough scheme to run beyond October (that’s mostly Nicola Sturgeon). Some kind of “one-off final payment” to help workers in vulnerable sectors to find work. A new industrial strategy that offers tax incentives to growth businesses. Immediate tax breaks for start-ups. A new scheme to support directors of limited companies who (because they pay themselves via dividends) aren’t included in any other schemes. A bailout for actors. A rise in out-of-work benefits for the newly unemployed. Yet more money for the still-failing NHS. VAT cuts. National insurance holidays. Extra tutoring for vulnerable children in the holidays. And of course an “infrastructure revolution”. No crisis is complete without demands for an infrastructure revolution.
Sounds expensive doesn’t it? It won’t all happen, but some of it will – and the UK has already spent fortunes on existing Covid measures. So how do we pay? Partly by recovering successfully. But outside that, there is no shortage of ideas. The infrastructure revolution could be paid for by forcing pension funds to buy special bonds. We could just keep borrowing (low interest rates make it easy) and put in place various forms of financial repression to make sure our bonds keep being bought. We could print money (and damn the inflation risk). We could introduce real austerity and cut the state back properly. Or we could try to pay at least part of the bill by raising taxes.
The first three of these are likely to play the biggest part. The fourth, likely none at all. The fifth will be part of the solution but (I hope) as much as a token nod to today’s relentless demands for wealth redistribution as anything else: high taxes aren’t known to encourage growth or even to redistribute wealth very well. Expect then some new tax on the “rich”. That could take the form of an ordinary wealth tax or yet another rise in property taxes.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
But a rather better idea has emerged from a study by academics at the University of Warwick and London School of Economics. They note that while the well-off in the UK pay much more tax in absolute terms than everyone else (remember that 50% of adults in the UK are one way or another net recipients of state funds), at higher levels the way in which we tax capital returns and income can often mean that their effective percentage rate is lower. If your income is all PAYE (for example, you are a very highly-paid bank employee) this is not the case. But if you are an investor or business owner it can be. Add it all up, say the academics, and over about £250,000 of total income, the system becomes “regressive”.
Their answer? A minimum effective tax rate on earned and unearned income and capital gains from all sources of 35%. This is not an awful idea (the US has something similar at 28%) and it would certainly make the tax system feel a little fairer. It might also start a conversation about the brilliant simplicity of flat taxes (something George Osborne was a great fan of before he became important). Imagine if we could cut the top rate of income tax to 35% (or lower) and raise that of capital gains tax to 35% (or lower, and preferably indexed to inflation). Wouldn’t everything feel an awful lot easier – both for those who pay and those who collect? I think so.
-
Steve Webb: The triple lock is there to do a job. I’m not embarrassed or ashamed of itThe triple lock means 13 million pensioners will now get an above-inflation state pension boost in April. While the rising cost of the policy has stirred controversy, Steve Webb, who served as pensions minister when it was introduced, argues the triple lock is vital and should stay. Webb speaks to Kalpana Fitzpatrick on the new episode of MoneyWeek Talks – out now.
-
How retirement pots risk running out 11 years early if inflation remains highPension savers could find their retirement income may not last as long as they anticipated over fears that inflation may not slow down
-
Chen Zhi: the kingpin of a global conspiracyChen Zhi appeared to be a business prodigy investing in everything from real estate to airlines. Prosecutors allege he is the head of something more sinister
-
Canada will be a winner in this new era of deglobalisation and populismGreg Eckel, portfolio manager at Canadian General Investments, selects three Canadian stocks
-
Jim O’Neill on nearly 25 years of the BRICSJim O’Neill, who coined the acronym BRICS in 2001, tells MoneyWeek how the group is progressing
-
Build or innovate? How to solve the productivity puzzleOpinion There are two main schools of thought when it comes to solving the productivity puzzle, says David C. Stevenson
-
More clouds gather over renewable energy trusts – is there any hope for the sector?The outlook for renewable energy trusts has gone from bad to worse this year, with the industry being caught in a 'perfect storm'
-
Should ISA investors be forced to hold UK shares?The UK government would like ISA investors to hold more UK stocks – but many of us are already overexposed
-
Why Scotland's proposed government bonds are a terrible investmentOpinion Politicians in Scotland pushing for “kilts” think it will strengthen the case for independence and boost financial credibility. It's more likely to backfire
-
How Germany became the new sick man of EuropeFriedrich Merz, Germany's Keir Starmer, seems unable to tackle the deep-seated economic problems the country is facing. What happens next?
