HMRC to claw back unneeded aid from businesses
Businesses that claimed money they didn’t need face trouble if they are found to have breached the schemes' terms.
Businesses judged to have breached the terms of government rescue schemes during the Covid-19 pandemic could face unprecedented demands for tax penalties under a planned crackdown – and even criminal prosecution. Firms are being warned to be meticulous about record-keeping amid increasing fears that HM Revenue & Customs will aggressively claw back financial support.
HMRC will initially focus on the Job Retention Scheme (JRS), through which the state has picked up the wage costs of millions of workers furloughed by their employers, and the Self Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS), which has so far offered grants of up to £7,500 to self-employed workers hit by crisis.
New legislation due to come into force next month will give businesses 30 days to declare any mistakes they have made when applying for JRS or SEISS support. They will then be required to repay the cash they have received.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Where HMRC suspects businesses were not entitled to support, it will investigate, with firms required to prove they were eligible. Unless they do so, HMRC is likely to demand a 100% tax charge on the money and will prosecute businesses that do not pay.
Fleecing the taxpayer
The tough approach comes amid concern that some firms have taken unfair advantage of the JRS and the SEISS, which have so far cost the taxpayer almost £27bn. There have been some examples of flagrant breaches, such as employers asking furloughed staff to work. But there have also been examples of businesses seeking financial support even though they haven’t been damaged by the crisis.
The legislation enabling HMRC to charge tax at 100% signals a determination by the government to recoup money paid out unnecessarily. The mechanism provides officials with a rapid route to recovery that effectively uses HMRC’s existing powers rather than requiring new laws.
Most businesses applying for financial support will have acted with integrity. But it is crucial to keep records of the application process and supporting evidence. For the JRS, for example, this would include evidence that employees would have continued to work had it not been for Covid-19; SEISS applicants must show they suffered financial disadvantage because of the virus and needed support.
Review record-keeping and documentation now, well in advance of any inquiry from HMRC. Some businesses may find they have not needed all of the support they anticipated would be required. In that case, consider paying it back before HMRC launches an investigation.
A loan to help you bounce back
Businesses that have borrowed relatively modest sums through the government-backed Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme (CBILS) could dramatically reduce their interest costs by switching to the Bounce Back loans facility.
Ministers launched the Bounce Back scheme several weeks into the Covid-19 crisis, responding to criticisms that smaller businesses were struggling to access cash through CBILS. By then, however, many businesses had secured finance through the original scheme.
Both schemes are administered through the banks, with the state underwriting the loans. Crucially, however, Bounce Back loans come with an interest rate set by the government at 2.5% a year, while with CBILS, lenders set their own rates; many are charging 6% a year or more.
The maximum Bounce Back loan is £50,000, so for businesses that have borrowed less than this from CBILS, it makes sense to switch. The Bounce Back loan scheme isn’t open to businesses that have already secured finance from CBILS, but there is an exception for firms borrowing in order to pay off a CBILS loan in full. Your bank should be able to help you refinance.
The government has pledged to keep the Bounce Back loan scheme open for applications until 4 November. Both Bounce Back loans and CBILS carry no interest charges or fees in year one, so for businesses confident about repaying CBILS there may be no need to switch. But for any business that expects to begin incurring interest, moving scheme makes sense. On the maximum £50,000 Bounce Back loan, interest charges will cost £1,250 a year from year two onwards. Assuming an interest rate of 6%, the same loan from CBILS will cost £3,000 a year to service.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
David Prosser is a regular MoneyWeek columnist, writing on small business and entrepreneurship, as well as pensions and other forms of tax-efficient savings and investments. David has been a financial journalist for almost 30 years, specialising initially in personal finance, and then in broader business coverage. He has worked for national newspaper groups including The Financial Times, The Guardian and Observer, Express Newspapers and, most recently, The Independent, where he served for more than three years as business editor.
-
Ofgem proposes new energy tariffs with low or no standing changes
Standing charges have invited public backlash as households battle high energy bills
By Katie Williams Published
-
Google shares bounce on Gemini 2.0 launch
Google has launched the latest version of its Gemini AI platform, and markets have responded positively. Is it time to buy Google shares?
By Dan McEvoy Published
-
Business rates relief to be slashed – how to cut costs
Labour has promised to reform business rates, the corporate equivalent of council tax
By David Prosser Published
-
Rouble hits two-year low against the dollar – what does it mean for Russia's economy?
New US sanctions have plunged the rouble to its lowest level since 2022. Why are investors spooked and how will this affect Putin's economy?
By Alex Rankine Published
-
Has Javier Milei succeeded in transforming Argentina's economy?
Javier Milei won an election last year on an “anarcho-capitalist” platform, promising to take a chainsaw to the overbearing and bloated state. How’s it going?
By Simon Wilson Published
-
Brazil booms – but why do investors remain wary?
Brazil is booming, but you wouldn’t think so from looking at the stock market. What's behind the market paranoia?
By Alex Rankine Published
-
How small businesses can take advantage of new sources of finance
Small business Banks have reduced lending to small companies, but there are alternatives as the finance market continues to evolve
By David Prosser Published
-
Do we need central banks, or is it time to privatise money?
Analysis Free banking is one alternative to central banks, but would switching to a radical new system be worth the risk?
By Stuart Watkins Published
-
Will the R&D tax credit change in the Autumn Budget?
Will Labour revise state help designed to foster R&D in the upcoming Autumn Budget?
By David Smith Published
-
How to improve economic output using the supply-side approach
Boosting potential economic output through public investment is crucial, says David C. Stevenson
By David C. Stevenson Published