To some, Anne Wojcicki is an “eternal optimist”, says the Financial Times – a medical industry pioneer who “won’t give up on her dream of using DNA kits to discover new drugs”. But, following the descent of the once high-flying 23andMe into bankruptcy protection, plenty of others aren’t quite so charitable. After repeated attempts to take the ailing genetics-testing firm she co-founded private, Wojcicki has now resigned as CEO to pursue an “independent” bid, amid plenty of sniping.
The rancour of shareholders is understandable. In 2008, Wojcicki used “her charm and Silicon Valley connections” to orchestrate a series of celebrity-studded “spit parties” publicising her new DNA-testing start-up, says the FT. The stars “dutifully filled 23andMe’s test tubes with their saliva”. Wojcicki’s “relentless optimism and charisma” helped “wave aside customer privacy fears and regulatory scrutiny”.
Over nearly two decades, some 15 million people splashed out for the $99 kit to learn more about their ancestry or health. “Many now appear to regret that decision.” Recently, both the company’s website and its wobbly shares crashed as customers rushed to delete their genetic data before it goes up for auction. The shares have lost 99% of their value since 2021, when 23andMe went public via a “blank cheque” company owned by Richard Branson, and became “a $6 billion unicorn”. The company is already “locked in investor disputes”. The mood won’t improve if Wojcicki secures the assets, washed clean by the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process, at a bargain price.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Who is Anne Wojcicki?
The Wojcicki family is the closest that Silicon Valley gets to a royal clan. Anne’s sister Susan, the former YouTube CEO who died last year, famously rented her Menlo Park garage to Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin – the latter became Anne’s husband (they divorced in 2015). A third sister, Janet, is a professor of paediatrics at the University of California.
The sisters grew up in an intensely academic environment, says Business Insider. Their father, Stanley, chaired Stanford’s physics department; their mother, Esther, was an influential journalist and teacher, sometimes dubbed the “Godmother” of the Valley. Anne Wojcicki credits her parents with conferring “a taste of freedom” as well as scientific inquiry – honed by “a childhood roaming around” the Stanford campus.
After graduating from Yale with a biology degree, Wojcicki headed for Wall Street and spent a decade working as a biotech and healthcare analyst. “Weary” of Wall Street’s avaricious approach to healthcare, she “decided to disrupt the industry”, says BusinessWomen. The founding aim of 23andMe, which began life in 2006, was to empower people “to take control of their well-being”. Named after the 23 pairs of chromosomes in the human genome, the start-up swiftly became “a trailblazer in personal genomics”. The kit was Time’s “Invention of the Year” in 2008, and Wojcicki was later named by Fast Company as one of America’s most “daring CEOs”.
Too daring, perhaps, says Fortune. 23andMe presents a bad case of overreach. Having built one of the world’s largest DNA databases, it began leveraging the data in 2015 – moving into “the staggeringly expensive business of drug development”. Ultimately, the retail side of the business wasn’t enough to cover costs. Already ailing, the firm was nearly torpedoed by a high-profile hack in 2023, from which it has never really recovered. From the outset, Wojcicki had bold visions and is known for her persistence, says the FT. But rebuilding the company seems a long shot.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Build or innovate? How to solve the productivity puzzleOpinion There are two main schools of thought when it comes to solving the productivity puzzle, says David C. Stevenson
-
Rail fares to be frozen for first time in 30 years – how much could you save?Chancellor Rachel Reeves will use her Budget to freeze rail fares but the savings could be offset by tax rises
-
Circle sets a new gold standard for cryptocurrenciesCryptocurrencies have existed in a kind of financial Wild West. No longer – they are entering the mainstream, and US-listed Circle is ideally placed to benefit
-
8 of the best converted industrial properties for saleThe best converted industrial properties for sale – from a Victorian railway station in Norfolk to a Grade II-listed former water tower with views of the River Alde
-
More clouds gather over renewable energy trusts – is there any hope for the sector?The outlook for renewable energy trusts has gone from bad to worse this year, with the industry being caught in a 'perfect storm'
-
Should ISA investors be forced to hold UK shares?The UK government would like ISA investors to hold more UK stocks – but many of us are already overexposed
-
Why Scotland's proposed government bonds are a terrible investmentOpinion Politicians in Scotland pushing for “kilts” think it will strengthen the case for independence and boost financial credibility. It's more likely to backfire
-
Who is Jared Isaacman, SpaceX astronaut and Trump's pick as NASA chief?Jared Isaacman is a close ally of Elon Musk and the first non-professional astronaut to walk in space. Now, he is in charge of NASA
-
Three solid British stocks going cheapOpinion Ian Lance and Nick Purves, fund managers at Temple Bar Investment Trust, highlight three British stocks with strong cash flows and robust balance sheets
-
Is now a good time to invest in Barclays?Barclays' profit growth is healthy, and the stock is cheap compared with its rivals
