What to do when you hit the pensions cap

High earners running up against pension caps should do their sums, says David Prosser.


The BMA fears experienced staff couldleave if pension rulings aren't changed
(Image credit: Credit: Adrian Sherratt / Alamy Stock Photo)

Should you give up work to avoid a nasty tax bill? This, apparently, is the dilemma now facing doctors in danger of reaching caps on pension-contribution limits. The generosity of the defined-benefit (DB) NHS pension scheme means many are incurring extra tax charges, either as they near retirement, or when they take on overtime and extra work. The British Medical Association (BMA)thinks the problem is so acute we need to change the rules in order to avoid losing crucial frontline staff from the NHS.

However, it's not just high-earning doctors who find themselves in a tricky spot. The annual allowance, limiting the amount of pension contributions you can make each tax year, and the lifetime allowance (LTA), a cap on the total size of your pension fund, apply to all savers. Most people don't get anywhere near them, but if you're a member of a DB scheme, you're more likely to exceed the limits. This is partly because the rules are complex on how contributions and pension rights in such schemes are valued. But DB pensions also offer more valuable benefits than other arrangements.

But are these savers really facing such bleak choices? The BMA argues that once doctors start running into additional tax charges they have no incentive to carry on working.In truth, however, the sums don't stack up in quite this way. The tax charge for those who breach the annual allowance is calculated according to their income, but for most people is likely to work out at between 40% and 45% of the excess. In other words, more than half the cash is still going into their pension. Nor does the charge have to be paid upfront you can usually elect to have your pension scheme pay it, with your benefits reduced accordingly. Similarly, the LTA stipulates a 55% charge on lump-sum withdrawals over the cap (currently £1.055m). No-one wants to pay that much tax, but there's still a benefit remaining.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

There are some complications to take into account. In particular, income from overtime is typically non-pensionable, so you don't get extra pension from it, but it does count towards your total income for the year. Since higher earners get a reduced annual allowance, this causes a problem for small numbers of people, though in most cases their additional exposure toan annual allowance charge will be cancelled out by their extra earnings.

Fees cap could be limiting returns

The damaging effect of high fees on your investment returns is well documented. So the government edict that workplace pension funds must not charge more than 0.75% a year (implemented in April 2015) seems eminently sensible.

But there's a problem, says the Association of Investment Companies (AIC), a trade body: fund managers offering exposure to illiquid assets such as private equity and infrastructure have higher costs and are struggling to keep fees under the cap.

As a result, workplace pension scheme members may not get the opportunity to invest in such funds,and therefore could be missing out.

The AIC's warning follows a review of the charges cap announced by ministers earlier this year. The government is eager to persuade pension schemes to invest more in infrastructure, so it's considering relaxing the rules. However, if it does so, pension scheme members will need to think carefully about their fund choices.

It's true, as the AIC says, that some private-equity and infrastructure funds havea record of outperformance this may be worth paying extra for. However, not every fund of this type outperforms, in whichcase the higher fee wouldbe part of a double-whammy effect that depresses your pension-fund returns.

David Prosser
Business Columnist

David Prosser is a regular MoneyWeek columnist, writing on small business and entrepreneurship, as well as pensions and other forms of tax-efficient savings and investments. David has been a financial journalist for almost 30 years, specialising initially in personal finance, and then in broader business coverage. He has worked for national newspaper groups including The Financial Times, The Guardian and Observer, Express Newspapers and, most recently, The Independent, where he served for more than three years as business editor.