Is this another flashing warning sign?
This week, a $7bn hedge fund shut down. Eton Park, run by Goldman Sachs child prodigy Eric Mindich (at the tender age of 27, he became the youngest partner in Goldman history), launched in 2004, with $3.5bn under management, one of the largest such launched ever at the time.
But it's had a rough time, particularly since 2009. The fund lost 9% last year in a year in which the US S&P 500 returned nearly 12% (including dividends). That's a really awful underperformance. So far this year, according to the Wall Street Journal, the fund is flat, versus a gain of around 5% for the S&P.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
It's a big name, but hardly the only casualty. More than 1,000 funds shut down last year the most since the 2008 financial crisis and there are now fewer funds around than at any time since 2013. A grand total of 8,326, according to data group HFR.
What's going on?
I can't help but think that it's interesting that hedge funds in many ways, sold as the ultimate in "active" investing, and certainly among the most expensive ways to invest out there are in decline just as passive investing in ultracheap funds is really taking off in a serious way.
Hedge funds have presented themselves as being victims of easy monetary policy and central bank money printing. In effect, trades based on what "should" happen have been disrupted and reversed by the intervention from on high by the likes of Janet Yellen and chums.
Meanwhile, others argue that passive funds have benefited greatly from this environment. In effect, the "dumb" money has done well while the "smart" money has struggled. "Beta" has been given an easier ride than "alpha".
I think this is rather a self-serving way to look at things (surprise, surprise). If your investment strategy is based on "big picture" events ("macro", in the jargon) and timing the market, and yet it doesn't attempt to take the actions of central banks and politicians into account, you shouldn't be in the "macro" business.
All the same, the closing down of this particular fund and the accelerating popularity of passive exchange-traded funds is another sign of the sort of "fin de sicle"-type shifts you often see near a top. You could also argue that it's populism that has blindsided the hedge funds (as it has the markets). Could this be a sign that we're hitting a peak of some sort?
As I said earlier in the week, the tricky thing about turning points is that you don't get any alarm bells going off that tell you exactly when to sell. But it's clear that conditions are ripe for a shift.
Keep an eye on the US jobs market
The initial jobless claims data measures how many people are claiming out of work benefits in the US. It comes out weekly. It's been going down for most of the time since 2009, and is now hovering around its lowest levels for years.
One thing about jobless claims, says Rosenberg, is that it's worth keeping an eye out for turning points. And last week, claims jumped quite significantly rising by 15,000 to 258,000. Also, the four-week moving average looks as though it "hit its cyclical trough on February 25th."
If that's correct, then it could be a big deal. You see, "lows in jobless claims are a classic late-cycle development. Just as when claims are hitting their peaks and everyone laments that the bad times are never going to end, well, those actually are the times when you want to start dipping more toes into the equity pool."
To be precise, the S&P 500, on average "peaks 14 weeks after the bottom in the four-week moving average in claims". And then, after 57 weeks, a recession starts.
Hmm. If we're looking at 14 weeks from 25 February 25, that's around about the end of May, early June for the market to peak. "Sell in May", right enough.
I think I'll add this to our list of "key charts" to watch.
This high street giant is worth looking at
Next
(LSE: NXT)
Until recently, it's looked like a falling knife a stock more liable to cut your fingers off than rebound in a rewarding manner. But the results this week were encouraging. Not because they were good, but because it sounded like the chief executive Simon Wolfson has got a handle on what's gone wrong.
He also made a proper attempt to discuss the issue of bricks and mortar' retailing and its decline - stress testing the property portfolio to figure out how much of a liability its store estate could turn out to be. The good news on that front is that the company's "lease structure is such that the portfolio could be managed down profitable".
The share price rebounded by 9% on the day. I reckon it's hit a turning point now. I haven't bought in myself yet but I am tempted to. I'd suggest that if you've had your eye on it, now's the time to be investigating further.
-
Stop inheritance tax perk on pensions, says IFSThe government could raise billions of pounds in revenue by closing inheritance tax loopholes, such as on pensions and AIM shares. Is your pension at risk?
-
Revealed: Best buy-to-let property hotspots in the UKLooking for the best buy-to-let property locations in the UK? We reveal the top 10 postcodes with the strongest rental returns
-
Next’s results stand out against a tough retail backdropAnalysis FTSE 100 retailer Next is dealing well with the tough conditions on the high street, with rising profits and a plan that's working. Rupert Hargreaves looks at the numbers.
-
Why Next is the only retailer I’d want to own in my portfolioNews The retail sector is brutally competitive. But high street stalwart Next is exploiting and building on its significant competitive advantages, says Rupert Hargreaves.
-
Next shares soar as sales smash expectations – is the stock a buy?News High street and online retailer Next has reported a big rise in sales and profits. John Stepek looks at its performance and asks if it's worth buying Next shares.
-
Little cheer on the high streetFeatures Profit warnings from Debenhams and Mothercare are more evidence that traditional retailers are fighting a losing battle against nimbler online competitors, says Ben Judge.
-
The cloud over retail has a silver liningCover Story A sense of gloom hangs over the retail sector – but pick the right stocks at the right price and there are still potential pots of gold out there for long-term buyers, says Phil Oakley.
-
Next: Out of fashionFeatures Clothing retailer Next has released gloomy results, yet the firm’s shares rallied strongly. Why? Ben Judge reports.
-
If you’d invested in: Indivior and NextFeatures Drugmaker Indivior is on the up, while retailer Next, once a favourite with investors, has lost its way.
-
Next faces its toughest year since 2008
Features The clothing retailer has long been a favourite of long-term investors, but now Next is facing tough times.
