The best brokers for your Isa

published 7 March 2017

Which stockbroker or fund supermarket do you use the most?

Articles about picking online stockbrokers or fund platforms tend to focus on comparing fees, but feedback from our readers suggests that costs are not the biggest priority for many of you. As evidence of this, consider your feedback on Hargreaves Lansdown, the biggest UK broker, in our reader survey. It scores well on all the criteria we use for rating brokers, except for costs. Readers consistently say that the firm is expensive. And it is compared to many of its peers but it offers a high-quality service, which is presumably why customers are prepared to stay with it.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

For the most part, we agree with your conclusions. Fees are just one part of the equation. Other factors such as quality of customer service, range of investments available and the stability of the firm are also important. The complication when picking a broker is that there isn't a strong relationship between how much you pay and what you get. Hargreaves Lansdown mostly does a good job, but so do many cheaper firms. Conversely some pricey ones are much worse. To make matters worse, the way fees are charged varies greatly between brokers, which can make it difficult to see if you're getting a good deal.

That's now changing, for a number of reasons: costs have risen, trading volumes are weak, trail commission was banned in 2014 and interest rates are extremely low. So most providers have now introduced some kind of admin fee or custody fee. Such fees are usually either levied as a percentage of the value of the assets you hold with them or as a flat fee. As a general rule, percentage-based fees are better for small accounts, while flat fees are more cost-effective for larger accounts (although many brokers cap their percentage fees once it reaches a certain level).

Dealing charges may vary depending on what kind of investment you buy. Some providers do not charge for dealing in open-end funds (unit trusts and open-ended investment companies or Oeics). These providers will then typically charge a percentage-based custody fee for these funds. The vast majority of providers will charge you a dealing fee to buy and sell shares, investment trusts and other products that are not open-end funds, but will either charge no custody, a capped custody fee or a fixed admininstration fee (which may be waived if you trade a certain amount).

The dealing fees for securities priced in sterling typically vary from as little as £5 to as much as £15 per trade. Some providers offer lower trading charges for frequent traders, but keep in mind that trading so often generally has a negative effect on your long-term returns. For international stocks and even often for UK-listed securities priced in currencies other than sterling most brokers will levy a foreign currency conversion charge which may be 1% or more of the value of the trade.

You'll also want to take into account other factors, such as how well the broker's platform works and how good the firm's customer service is. Your priorities here are likely to depend on how you like to trade. If you prefer to trade over the phone, you will want a broker that has a good telephone broking team with decent opening hours. You'll also want to pay attention to the cost of telephone dealing, as this is often more expensive than online dealing. If you prefer to trade online, you are likely to want a provider whose website is easy to use.

The financial stability of your broker is also important. The Financial Services Compensation Scheme for investments will pay up to £50,000 in compensation (per customer per firm) if your broker goes bust and is unable to hand over money or investments kept with them. In almost all circumstances, your broker should be keeping its clients' cash and investments separate from the firm's assets, which means that they should not be available to creditors in the event of financial collapse and will eventually be returned to you.

However, sometimes when a broker fails, there are problems with this "ring fencing" or "segregation of assets" and it turns out that client assets particularly cash are missing due to negligence or fraud. So the FSCS is an important safety net. If your account is large and the £50,000 FSCS cover doesn't seem that much, you will want to look into the financial strength of your broker carefully and perhaps split your savings between more than one firm.

So with all that in mind, let's catch up on who topped our reader poll. Hargreaves Lansdown came first last year and does so again this year. High scores for service are let down only by the worst ranking for costs among the major brokers. The Share Centre came second, up one place from last year. Its main negative points were a smaller (though still reasonable) range of investments and a lower ranking on financial strength (the latter essentially reflects our readers' subjective perception of how big, stable and established a company is in this case, The Share Centre is a far smaller firm than Hargreaves Lansdown, although it has been in business for more than 25 years and is listed, so investors can easily monitor its financials).

AJ Bell Youinvest slipped one place from second to third, which may have something to do with recent fee changes (it introduced a custody fee for shares in its dealing account and Isa for the first time). Like Share Centre, Youinvest ranked lower than Hargreaves Lansdown on perceived financial strength, reflecting its lower profile (the company is privately held, with investors including Neil Woodford, but publishes detailed financial reports).

Interactive Investor and TD Direct Investing, which have announced they will be merging in the near future, followed close behind. Interactive Investor's worst scores were for customer service and administrative efficiency; it also scored lower on perceived financial stability, reflecting the fact that it's owned by a private-equity fund rather than a high-profile company. TD Direct Investing, which is currently owned by Canada's Toronto Dominion Bank, scored acceptably on most categories, but ranked lower on fees.

Lastly, we found a curious quirk in the results for Halifax and iWeb. These are the same service, with the same owner (Lloyds Bank), but different fees (iWeb is far cheaper). iWeb users gave the firm top scores on costs but they also gave it much higher scores than Halifax in most other categories. In short, customers who are getting a very cheap service seem happier with this broker but those who are paying more had some reservations about the quality of customer service and the range of investments. Taking iWeb's scores alone, it would have topped the poll but if we consider the Halifax and iWeb scores combined, it would have ranked in line with AJ Bell Youinvest, Interactive Investor and TD Direct Investing.

Explore More

Sarah is MoneyWeek's investment editor. She graduated from the University of Southampton with a BA in English and History, before going on to complete a graduate diploma in law at the College of Law in Guildford. She joined MoneyWeek in 2014 and writes on funds, personal finance, pensions and property.