Chilcot’s never-ending story

Once completed, the Chilcot report "should provide an unprecedented insight into one of the most disastrous decisions made by a British government in recent times", says Richard Norton-Taylor in The Guardian. But it looks like we could be waiting at least another eight months, meaning that the amount of time required to complete the report will now be "longer than British soldiers spent occupying Iraq".

The report, which has cost £10m and "saw its last witness in 2011", has been dogged by criticism and delays since its launch in 2009. Perhaps, joked broadcaster Jon Snow, Sir John Chilcot and "the inquiry team decided that redemption lies in producing the longest ever work in the English language".

According to Norton-Taylor, the delay is largely due to Chilcot's previous experiences with "Maxwellisation", a confidential process in which people who are to be criticised in the report are given advance copies so that they have a chance to formtheir rebuttals. Whether the full truth will be revealed is unlikely as "it is not only [Tony] Blair and former Labour ministers and political advisers who will be attacked, but senior Whitehall officials".

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

By having the final say on the report before it goes public, Whitehall has secured "a powerful weapon". Chilcot reckons the report will be out by June/July, but he could be required by law to publish no later than 18 April, says Christopher Hope in The Daily Telegraph bereaved families are considering a legal challenge to bring forward the date.

The problem now, says the FT, is that "unless he reports soon, Sir John's effort will come to be remembered not for what he says but for how long he took to say it". Yet "the real Iraq scandal is the hypocrisy of those condemning Blair after backing his war", says James Kirkup in The Daily Telegraph. In 2005, UK voters had the chance to pass judgement, but 9.5 million re-elected him "fully aware of what had happened".