How big should the state be? The political consensus appears to be that it should be very big indeed. Last week the BBC's assistant political editor referred to the idea of a smaller state as "utterly terrifying".
Chancellor George Osborne went on Radio 4 immediately to dismiss this as "hyperbole". But, asJanet Daley points out in her column inThe Sunday Telegraph, he also effectively "denied that he had any intention of significantly decreasing the functions of government".
Why? Because, like most politicians, he believes the general population can't cope with the idea of a smaller state: the idea is not only "frightening, but incomprehensible a dismantling of allthe known laws ofthe universe".
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
This is a shame. That's partly because he is wrong in thinking that everyone in the UK agrees with state-supported assistant political editors. A large part of the population is well aware that the finances of the state are unsustainable and that the state must, as a result, shrink.
They would also vote in a government that was prepared to admit this. But it is also because Osborne has to cut the size of the state (at least relative to GDP) substantially: as the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank points out, without a "fundamental reimagining of the state", his sums don't add up at all.
So we have to think the apparently unthinkable. We have to confront the many vested interests in our public sector the ring-fences around our sacred cow services and the automatic spending reflex to special pleading.
How? I've written here before about how countries such as Canada have in the past done full reviews of every single part of the state's spending, with every programme having to justify itself or be axed. These have been very successful indeed.
We need the same. Allister Heath, writing in The Daily Telegraph, suggests establishing a cross party and "not especially ideological" Commission into Public Spending to do the same in the UK.
It could look at abolishing or merging entire departments; means testing all benefits; privatising motorways; getting rid of all the regulations that make both prices and compensatory welfare payments high; dumping layers of pointless management and doubling up of services; introducing user fees for services; and cutting the endless subsidies that make business so confusing.
This won't be easy and it is possible (if very unlikely) that the Commission would come up with no good ideas or cuts at all. But if we don't start to get a grip on the size of our state, we will never get the UK back on a stable financial footing. That's the really utterly terrifying thing.
Finally, I wanted to let you know that we have a new comments section on our website, moneyweek.com. It should be much easier to use than our old one and I would love you to try it out. Thank you!
-
8 of the best houses for sale with annexesThe best houses with annexes – from a period property in the Lake District to a 13th-century house with a two-bedroom annexe in Saltwood, Kent
-
Zelenskyy moves to appease Donald Trump – what happens now?Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelenskyy is conceding ground to secure the least-worst deal possible, says Emily Hohler
-
Inflation may be slipping but there is still plenty of misery aheadEditor's letter Inflation may be a little lower than last month as the prices of petrol and diesel fall back, but it remains structural and long-term, says Merryn Somerset Webb. And there are no painless solutions.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
The public may have reached its limit for tax risesEditor's letter The UK tax burden is now at a 70-year high. And, while there may be some reason to hold off on cuts right now, taxes are too high because the state tries to do too much. Perhaps it should do less, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Things may look bad – but they’re not that badEditor's letter The UK faces plenty of problems, says John Stepek. But things may not be as bad as they look. Our debt to GDP ratio is lower than many other major economies, and high employment means a healthy tax take. That gives the new chancellor room to cut taxes so people can keep more of their own money.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
