Beware of dodgy insurance
Payment protection insurance is overpriced, difficult to claim on and often missold, says Tim Bennett. But new proposals from the Competition Commission could change some of that.
"A huge victory for consumers" is how Peter Vicary-Smith, head of Which?, hailed the latest payment protection insurance (PPI) proposals from the Competition Commission. No wonder. As Thisismoney.co.uk notes, the "charge sheet against PPI" (which is meant to insure you against being unable to repay a loan or credit-card balance if you fall ill or lose your job) is long. Complaints about Britain's 13 million policies include that it's "overpriced, sold to people who can never claim on it, sold with no cancellation clause, and often ineffective". It's also often "forced on customers by pushy sales staff".
The statistics are grim. Only 14% of PPI premiums are returned to customers as a result of successful claims that's compared to 78% for car insurance and 54% for home insurance. And as Caroline Binham reports on Bloomberg, the regulator found in June that PPI providers overcharge customers by £1.4bn a year, against annual sales of £5.5bn. So what's changing? The Competition Commission stopped short of banning PPI altogether. But it is banning "single premium policies", where the premium is paid up front and often added to the original loan as a lump sum. Providers will also be stopped from pushing customers to take PPI immediately. They will have to wait 14 days and tailor any quote to ensure the policy is suitable.
Fine, say the banks but loan rates will rise because the income from PPI sales often subsidises interest charges. And the changes come just as people need cover going into a recession. This is "nonsense", as The Independent's Julian Knight puts it. There's "never a good time to be mis-sold a policy". The extra transparency should stop millions from buying cover they either don't need, or that doesn't do what they expect. If you think you may have been sold an unsuitable PPI plan some campaigners reckon there's a problem with up to half of them you can complain to the Financial Ombudsman
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Tim graduated with a history degree from Cambridge University in 1989 and, after a year of travelling, joined the financial services firm Ernst and Young in 1990, qualifying as a chartered accountant in 1994.
He then moved into financial markets training, designing and running a variety of courses at graduate level and beyond for a range of organisations including the Securities and Investment Institute and UBS. He joined MoneyWeek in 2007.
-
Pension warning: one in five don’t know how much is going into their pension
How to check your pension contributions and why it matters
By Katie Williams Published
-
50,000 power of attorney applications rejected – how to avoid common mistakes
A freedom of information request shows that thousands of lasting power of attorney (LPA) applications are rejected due to errors. We explain how to avoid mistakes and reveal tips to make the process as straightforward as possible
By Ruth Emery Published