"Rejoice, active fund managers!" says Adam Lewis in Fund Strategy. According to the latest research on fund management performance, the best fund managers are worth paying for they do have the ability to add value for investors. The bad news is that tapping that extra value as a retail investor is fraught with difficulty.
Researchers at specialist fund evaluation firm Inalytics set themselves two challenges. The first was to define what constitutes skill (or alpha') in fund management. The second was to work out what extra return an investor could expect to earn from following the best managers.
After analysing 760 global equity portfolios, Inalytics concluded that the most skilful fund managers share three traits: they get more investment decisions right than wrong, they run their winners, and they know when to cut their losses.
Start your trial of MoneyWeek today
Get unparalleled financial insight, analysis and expert opinion you can profit from.
Start your trial
Sign up for MoneyWeek’s free twice-daily newsletter.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Join more than 165,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with latest financial news, insights and expert analysis to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
To be blunt, this is all incredibly obvious stuff. Studies of investing psychology have proved many times that we all like to bank early profits as evidence of our skill,and none of us likes to admit to making a mistake. So we sell good stocks too soon and run duff investments long after we should have sold them. Probably the most interesting aspect of the Inalytics study is just how crucial running winners and selling losers is and the sheer difficulty that even the experts' have in doing this.
Latest Videos FromMoneyWeek
So how much extra value do the best managers add? The answer is 242 basis points 2.42% per year above the average for the top quartile (the top 25% of managers). So should we abandon trackers and instead try to hunt down the best fund managers?
In theory, yes but in practice it's tricky. How do you know who will stay hot? Even fund managers with the best track records get it wrong, as anyone who followed superstar manager Anthony Bolton into China knows. And getting it wrong can be expensive. The bottom two quartiles containing the least-skilful managers returned 101 and 238 basis points per year below the average. In a tough market, that would translate into a truly awful absolute return for the worst funds.
That's why the main criteria to consider when picking a fund still has to be the one thing you have any sort of control over the costs. If you can shave, say, 1% a year off the cost of investing you'll boost the end value of a fund, regardless of its performance. The best way to do that? Buy low-cost investment trusts and cheap passive' investment products, such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
