Report claims Sainsburys source questions Tesco trading statement etiquette
Competition between two of the UK's largest supermarket chains heated up on Thursday morning after a news report published by Sky News claimed that an executive at Sainsbury's had issued an email to City analysts asking them to question rival Tesco's latest trading update.
Competition between two of the UK's largest supermarket chains heated up on Thursday morning after a news report published by Sky News claimed that an executive at Sainsbury's had issued an email to City analysts asking them to question rival Tesco's latest trading update.
The unnamed alleged source, which Sky News referred to as a "senior member of Sainsbury's investor relations team", reportedly questioned the appropriateness of an accounting technique applied to calculate Tesco's like-for-like sales over a five week period.
Tesco published its trading statement for the five week period covering Christmas and New Year on thursday morning referring to two separate figurtes for its like-for-like sales. In the first paragraph of Tesco's trading statement, the chain referred to like-for-like sales increasing by 1.8% whilst further on in the report's appendix it referred to a IFRIC-13 compliant like-for-like sales growth of 1.4%.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
An excerpt of the alleged email from the unnamed Sainsbury's source was published on Sky News quoting the following statements: "I thought it worth pointing out that the UK [like-for-like] number of 1.8pc that Tesco are reporting this morning is non-IFRIC compliant".
"This is a bit disingenuous, they should be using the 1.4% number in their headline. All of our reported numbers are IFRIC compliant, as they have to be under IAS18!"
Sky also points out that "The numbers announced by Tesco covered 42 trading days, while Sainsbury's statement covered 98 days, further pointing to the danger of relying on comparisons which can be misleading."
Tom Hoskin, head of corporate media at Tesco told ShareCast: "We publish every formulation of LFL number, including the IFRIC-adjusted."
Sainsbury's declined to comment when ShareCast contacted the press office.
MF
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
-
Why CEOs deserve a pay rise
Opinion The CEOs of big companies often come under fire for being grossly overpaid. But the truth, as per some economists, is the opposite. Do they merit a pay rise?
By Stuart Watkins Published
-
Europe prepares to stand alone as Trump turns on Ukraine
Support for old military alliances is wavering in the US under Donald Trump. Europe’s leaders are rushing to fill the void. Simon Wilson reports
By Simon Wilson Published