On Friday December 14th, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit announced that it had upheld the District Court in Delaware's finding that biopharmaceutical business AstraZeneca's substance patent protecting Crestor is valid and enforceable.
The ruling follows legal wranglings dating back five years. In 2007, nine generic drug manufacturers filed Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) with Paragraph IV certifications of non-infringement, invalidity, or unenforceability with respect to the Crestor '314 substance patent.
AstraZeneca and Shionogi, the owner of the '314 patent, filed patent infringement suits against eight manufacturers who had challenged the '314 substance patent. The suits were consolidated by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation and tried in the U.S. District Court, District of Delaware.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
In June 2010, the US District Court for the District of Delaware found the '314 patent valid and enforceable and infringed by the eight generic defendants.
Following last week's decision, the defendants may seek a rehearing and/or review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
AstraZeneca's share price was down 0.05% to 2,922.50p at 11:45 on Monday morning.
MF
-
Trump’s tariffs: what is he thinking and how should UK respond?Every right-thinking person knows that free trade is a surer route to the wealth of nations than protectionism, says Stuart Watkins. What is Trump thinking?
-
Barclays begins paying up to £100 compensation to customers after banking outageBarclays will pay up to £7.5 million in compensation to customers after its banking services were disrupted by an IT outage
