Can Britain’s pensioners be trusted with their new-found pensions freedom?

Australia’s ‘pensions freedom’ resulted in a lot of broke pensioners. Could the same happen here? And if so, should we reverse the recent pension changes?

150421-pensioners

We could see a lot of happy pensioners swiftly followed by a lot of broke pensioners

Given Australia's experience, should the new pension freedoms be reversed?

If we get to spend our heavily taxpayer-subsidised pension savings as and when we like, we have a responsibility to other taxpayers to make sure we do it right and in particular, that we don't spend it too quickly.

Are the UK's pensioners up to the job? Look to Australia, and it is hard to be sure they are.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

The Australians introduced reforms very similar to our new ones around 20 years ago. The result? Happy pensioners. Then broke pensioners.

The over-80s are running out of cash, their financial needs are putting an increasing burden on the state (other taxpayers), and last year the Australian government launched a consultation to see if it should reintroduce some kind of compulsory annuitisation.

Their conclusion was that, given rising longevity and the difficulty people have in planning for it, pensioners should probably be forced to use at least some of their pot to buy an annuity.

And what do the Australians think of our move to pensions freedom? "Sounds like a politician looking to be re-elected", Deloitte partner Russell Mason told a conference audience in Australia last year. It is a reasonable point.

At MoneyWeek, we are great believers in financial freedom, and we have been thrilled by the moves away from compulsory annuities. But we are also well aware of the problems exemplified by the Australian experience, and reckon there is more change to come here.

The Australian suggestion of partial annuitisation makes some sense. Perhaps everyone could be asked to annuitise their first £100,000 with the income kicking in from age 75, for example.

But there is also the question of the age at which people can access their pensions: 55 seems way too young to get your hands on money that has been topped up by the taxpayer with a view to financing your old age: who retires at 55? An extra ten years saving (and hence ten years less spending) might make all the difference in the UK.

Merryn Somerset Webb

Merryn Somerset Webb started her career in Tokyo at public broadcaster NHK before becoming a Japanese equity broker at what was then Warburgs. She went on to work at SBC and UBS without moving from her desk in Kamiyacho (it was the age of mergers).

After five years in Japan she returned to work in the UK at Paribas. This soon became BNP Paribas. Again, no desk move was required. On leaving the City, Merryn helped The Week magazine with its City pages before becoming the launch editor of MoneyWeek in 2000 and taking on columns first in the Sunday Times and then in 2009 in the Financial Times

Twenty years on, MoneyWeek is the best-selling financial magazine in the UK. Merryn was its Editor in Chief until 2022. She is now a senior columnist at Bloomberg and host of the Merryn Talks Money podcast -  but still writes for Moneyweek monthly. 

Merryn is also is a non executive director of two investment trusts – BlackRock Throgmorton, and the Murray Income Investment Trust.