Some great Elliott waves in the Nasdaq

America's more volatile Nasdaq index is throwing up some terrific Elliot waves. Can this tell us where the Dow is heading? John C Burford compares the charts.

The divergence between the Dow and the Nasdaq that I pointed out in Monday's post continues. It's throwing up some interesting possibilities in terms of Elliott waves.

This is the Nasdaq chart from Monday:

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Become a smarter, better informed investor with MoneyWeek.

From last Thursday's high, I can count a very clear five-wave move down to Friday's low on this 15-minute chart. That is my first clue that the market may have turned.

And there is a large positive-momentum divergence between waves 3 and 5 (red bar).

Advertisement - Article continues below

This is a textbook set-up for a relief rally of some kind and that's exactly what happened, with a move to the Fibonacci 38% retrace followed by a resumption of the downtrend.

At that point on Monday morning, there were a couple of directions the market could plausibly go. Because relief rallies off a five-wave down move are usually, but not always, in an A-B-C form, there was a chance the market would turn back up to form such an A-B-C.

The rally so far has only one leg, which could turn out to be the A wave with the B and C waves to follow.

Another possibility was for the market to resume its decline below Friday's low and go on to make a more complex wave pattern.

But if the former scenario played out, that would lend strength to the bearish case, since five waves down and three up is very often a prelude to a much larger decline. That could spell the end of the bull market.

How the market played out


During Monday's session the market whipped around quite violently but did go on to reach the Fibonacci 50% level, thus finally making a clear A-B-C. That satisfied my preferred Elliott wave scenario.

Advertisement - Article continues below

A great trade was to short the market near that 50% retrace.

Now, I have enough trading off the Friday low to be able to look for tramlines and here they are:


My lower line, which could draw in first, has four touch points and with Tuesday's trading, I could add another one, making five. This is enough to give this line five stars!

Then, my upper one has only two good touch points, but also sports a good prior pivot point (PPP), making that one a four star.

But the crucial point about these lines is this: the maximum C wave rally to the Fibonacci 50% level fell well short of the upper tramline. This indicates a weakening market and soon after, the market did break below the lower tramline.

So this falling short acted as a warning that the downtrend was likely back in force. So it proved.

Advertisement - Article continues below

And when the market broke that tramline, that was another excellent place to enter a short trade.

But I have more Elliott waves in Tuesday's trading.

Here is the move off the C wave high:


I have a clear wave count with wave 3 being long and strong, as required. And wave 4 has a clear A-B-C pattern. And there is a large positive-momentum divergence at the wave 5 low (red bar).

Naturally, after these five waves down, we expect a rally hopefully in three waves to a Fibonacci retrace... and that appears to be happening as I write.

But there is an alternative interpretation of the Elliott waves!


From Thursday's high on the hourly chart, we have a potential A-B-C down with a slight positive-momentum divergence (red bar). This implies that the main uptrend is still intact, of course.

Advertisement - Article continues below

As of this morning, both options have equal merit.

But what is happening over in the Dow as these Elliott waves are playing out in the Nasdaq?

Does the Dow fit this story?


This is the hourly chart, but peer as I might, I cannot find any obvious Elliott waves to match those in the Nasdaq. There are many times when the Elliott waves just aren't visible.

But there is a rising wedge here. These patterns usually resolve in an opposite thrust in this case, down. The upper limit is the upper line and a sharp move above this line will likely cancel out my Nasdaq analysis.

All we can expect as traders is that our methods give us an edge but we must accept that sometimes our edge is blunt and give us a false signal. No method on earth can approach 100% reliability.

But running your winners and cutting your losers is the one strategy that ensures your survival and should provide superior returns over time.



Share tips

How my 2019 spreadbetting tips fared

Matthew Partridge reviews performance of his 2019 spreadbetting tips. This year’s winners include Bellway, JD Sports and Taylor Wimpey.
17 Dec 2019
Spread betting

Betting on politics: some safe Labour bets

Matthew Partridge outlines a few flutters on what should be safe Labour seats in the general election.
10 Dec 2019
Spread betting

DS Smith will deliver: here's how to play the share price

Packaging group DS Smith is profiting from the online retail boom. Matthew Partridge explains how traders can play the share price.
3 Dec 2019
Spread betting

Betting on politics: don't put your money on the SNP

Scottish voters are strongly opposed to another independence referendum, says Matthew Partridge. That opens up a few tasty punts against he SNP.
29 Nov 2019

Most Popular


Want to make money in 2020? Gold and silver are looking like a good bet

If you want to make money from investing, says Dominic Frisby, it’s simple: find a bull market and go long. And in 2020 gold and silver are in a bull …
22 Jan 2020

Money Minute Friday 24 January: the key to UK interest-rate cuts

Today's Money Minute looks ahead to the release of data that could hold the key to UK interest rates cuts. 
24 Jan 2020

Money Minute Thursday 23 January: European interest rates

In today's Money Minute we look ahead to Christine Lagarde's second interest-rate-setting meeting at the European Central Bank.
23 Jan 2020

How the boom in passive investing could create better-run companies

ESG investing, or "ethical investing" as it used to be called, is mostly about the marketing, says John Stepek. But it's not all bad.
24 Jan 2020