Right. The mansion tax. Here we go again. You can read myprevious blogs on this here. But a few points to add today.
The problem with our property market is not that people living in expensive houses are too rich and that this isn't fair. It is that our property market is artificially supported by a host of government policies designed first to keep our banks' bad debts on hold while they have a go at rebuilding their balance sheets, and second to allow every billionaire in the world to hedge their global bets by holding empty London properties for nothing but the cost of a cut-rate council tax.
Our house prices, as Hugo Rifkind points out in The Times today, are "a disease". They infect everything, preventing people fromstarting theirlives properly, constantly widening the gap between rich and poor, prompting huge welfare payouts in housing benefits and the like, and making us all commute for hours to get to work (I am writing this on my frequentfour-hour train ride from Scotland to London).
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
We've always had this problem to a degree, but the credit-driven property bubble in the run up to 2008 drove itto new heights heights from which our politicians are terrified to let it fall. A mansion tax will make no difference to any of this "however much you tax a house worth £2m, your kids' primary school teacher still isn't getting a garden", says Rifkind.
A government that devoted its energies to something other than preventing house prices falling in nominal terms (cutting the size of the state perhaps) might.
Regular readers will know that I have no particular problem with a property location tax. In fact, in isolation, I think it would be a wonderful thing. If we were dumping other taxes (such as the hideously distortionary income-tax system, for example) to put in place what is effectively a location tax (most people with houses over £2m have paid not for bricks and mortar but for the location of those bricks and mortar).
And if we were doing that because a location tax is efficient and fair, the mansion tax idea would be all well and good. But that isn't the plan.
Instead, our idiot politicians want to put their mansion tax in on top of all our other wealth taxes (think capital gains tax, stamp duty andinheritance tax(IHT) for starters), and they want to do it, not to improve efficiency, but to show their voters that they hate 'rich' people more than all the other parties.
If you aren't convinced that thisis all about the battle to hit the rich, read this New Statesman blog which makes it clear thatthe whole idea is to produce a great unfairness "against this generation of the rich." Pathetic really, isn't it?
It seems to me and you must be as bored of hearing it as I am of repeating it that failing a total overhaul of our entire tax system to take account of the fact that income taxes are bad and location taxes are better, we should just recognise that windfall property gains are undertaxed by putting a capital gains tax on primary properties and be done with it. The (excellent) arguments for this are discussed here: Two steps towards solving the housing 'crisis'.
-
Most expensive street in Britain to buy on has houses with '£10m average asking price', Rightmove findsNews Rightmove found Buckingham Gate, close to Buckingham Palace, was the most expensive street in the country. Do you live near one that's been included on the list?
-
Smaller companies: starting to turn?The long-awaited turnaround in smaller companies is unlikely to happen just because shares are lowly-valued. However, an improving economic and interest rate backdrop could spark renewed interest in the sector. M&A activity is also providing support for the smaller companies sector
-
Beating inflation takes more luck than skill – but are we about to get lucky?Opinion The US Federal Reserve managed to beat inflation in the 1980s. But much of that was down to pure luck. Thankfully, says Merryn Somerset Webb, the Bank of England may be about to get lucky.
-
Rishi Sunak can’t fix all our problems – so why try?Opinion Rishi Sunak’s Spring Statement is an attempt to plaster over problems the chancellor can’t fix. So should he even bother trying, asks Merryn Somerset Webb?
-
Young people are becoming a scarce resource – we should value them more highlyOpinion In the last two years adults have been bizarrely unkind to children and young people. That doesn’t bode well for the future, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Ask for a pay rise – everyone else isOpinion As inflation bites and the labour market remains tight, many of the nation's employees are asking for a pay rise. Merryn Somerset Webb explains why you should do that too.
-
Why central banks should stick to controlling inflationOpinion The world’s central bankers are stepping out of their traditional roles and becoming much more political. That’s a mistake, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How St Ives became St Tropez as the recovery drives prices sky highOpinion Merryn Somerset Webb finds herself at the epicentre of Britain’s V-shaped recovery as pent-up demand flows straight into Cornwall’s restaurants and beaches.
-
The real problem of Universal Basic Income (UBI)Merryn's Blog April employment numbers showed 75 per cent fewer people in the US returned to employment compared to expectations. Merryn Somerset-Webb explains how excessive government support is causing a shortage of labour.
-
Why an ageing population is not necessarily the disaster many people think it isOpinion We’ve got used to the idea that an ageing population is a bad thing. But that’s not necessarily true, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
