BP bows to reality as it writes down $17bn of assets
The oil giant has ditched its conspicuously bullish outlook and written down the value of its assets. Will it cut its dividend too? Matthew Partridge reports
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/76b09/76b09d29f43750cfe515d71496ed6231c33becf3" alt="Thunder Horse oil rig © BP"
BP has announced that it will slash $17.5bn off the value of its oil and gas assets as it takes a “downbeat” view of longer-term oil prices in the wake of the pandemic, says Anjli Raval in the Financial Times. The company now thinks that Covid-19 will not only have a “lasting impact” on the global economy but will also “accelerate the transition towards cleaner energies”. As a result it is cutting the long-term price assumption for crude oil and natural gas by over a quarter to $55 a barrel in the case of Brent Crude, and to $2.90 per million British thermal units for gas.
BP’s move is long overdue, says Nils Pratley in The Guardian. The recent plunge in crude left BP’s assumption that long-term prices would be around $75 a barrel, already a more bullish outlook that its rivals’, “looking silly”. Still, it means that a chunk of BP’s current oil and gas assets “will never be developed”. This should encourage CEO Bernard Looney to speed up his plan for “greening BP and supporting energy transition”. At present BP’s spending on renewables is limited to a “tokenistic” $500m out of an investment budget that will be $12bn even after the recent “sharp trim”.
Time to go green?
The revised expectations of future oil prices could remove one of the major barriers to increased investment in renewables: higher returns from putting money into oil and gas have “simply been too tempting” for oil majors, says Chris Hughes on Bloomberg. There is even a possibility that BP could decide to “make a virtue of diversification”, offering large business clients “energy from multiple sources in a way that combines security of supply with an increased proportion of renewable provision”.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b64/a0b64dc4570f2901441dfc9e97a62ae665f79e04" alt="https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg"
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
However, in the short run the immediate impact will be to weaken BP’s balance sheet by increasing its gearing, the ratio of debt to net assets. Since gearing is a “closely watched ratio”, BP will be under pressure to take action to reduce it, says Emily Gosden in The Times. One option is to reduce debt through asset sales. However, the fact that this is a “terrible part of the cycle” to be selling means that it’s not going to get much cash. This leaves cutting its dividend, at $8.5bn a year the biggest in the FTSE, as the only other option. With rival Shell having already chosen to cut its payout to shareholders, many think it is a question of “when not if” BP will follow suit.
Cutting its dividend could risk anger from shareholders, especially since many think the pandemic will “encourage more people into their cars, pushing up fuel consumption and oil prices”, says George Hay on Breakingviews. BP’s $30-odd billion of cash also allows it to maintain the dividend “for now”. Still, since keeping the payout will hamper further investment in renewables, BP’s choice may be between “annoying shareholders today, or in the future”. In any case, BP’s shares now yield 9%, suggesting investors have already priced in a cut.
Sign up for MoneyWeek's newsletters
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Matthew graduated from the University of Durham in 2004; he then gained an MSc, followed by a PhD at the London School of Economics.
He has previously written for a wide range of publications, including the Guardian and the Economist, and also helped to run a newsletter on terrorism. He has spent time at Lehman Brothers, Citigroup and the consultancy Lombard Street Research.
Matthew is the author of Superinvestors: Lessons from the greatest investors in history, published by Harriman House, which has been translated into several languages. His second book, Investing Explained: The Accessible Guide to Building an Investment Portfolio, is published by Kogan Page.
As senior writer, he writes the shares and politics & economics pages, as well as weekly Blowing It and Great Frauds in History columns He also writes a fortnightly reviews page and trading tips, as well as regular cover stories and multi-page investment focus features.
Follow Matthew on Twitter: @DrMatthewPartri
-
Why Chinese stocks are so far out of favour
There’s little appetite for Chinese stocks despite low valuations.
By MoneyWeek Published
-
The 62 UK areas where you could be priced out of using your Lifetime ISA
Saving for your first home in Croydon, Ealing, Brent or any one of these other locations? You could be at risk of being priced out of using your Lifetime ISA
By Katie Williams Published
-
Why Chinese stocks are so far out of favour
There’s little appetite for Chinese stocks despite low valuations.
By MoneyWeek Published
-
Three companies that dominate their markets with critical products
A professional investor tells us where he’d put his money. This week: Charlie Huggins, manager of Wealth Club’s Quality Shares Portfolio, picks three stocks.
By Charlie Huggins Published
-
Should you continue to hold Smithson Investment Trust?
Opinion Smithson Investment Trust, a small- and mid-cap fund, has struggled to live up to lofty expectations, says Rupert Hargreaves.
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
Primark owner Associated British Foods is an overlooked gem going cheap — should you buy shares?
Associated British Foods, the owner of Primark, is a family-owned business, which means it is passed over by the increasingly popular passive investment funds. That spells opportunity for private investors, says Jamie Ward.
By Jamie Ward Published
-
Trump's tariffs and a shrinking market for alcohol deal double blow to Diageo
Donald Trump's tariffs are a further headache for drinks giant Diageo, which is already being buffeted by a decline in alcohol consumption.
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published
-
Three stocks in recruitment companies with promising recovery plays
Recruitment agency Robert Walters and its peers are struggling, but now's the time to buy, says Rupert Hargreaves
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
Four UK data companies to buy now
Companies that create, harness or turn data into a valuable offering could be sitting on a hugely profitable gold mine. Rupert Hargreaves picks four of the best UK data companies to buy now.
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
China's DeepSeek AI is a 'Sputnik moment' for the US
The US is facing a new “Sputnik moment” with the sudden appearance of China's DeepSeek AI firm wiping $1 trillion off the value of US tech stocks.
By Alex Rankine Published