One of the key developments in military technology in recent years has been the rapid rise of unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones. Their major advantage is that they allow military forces to carry out attacks and survey the battlefield without either directly risking soldiers’ lives or expensive aircraft.
While drones are not a new technology, they used to be so large and expensive that their use was limited. Over the years they have become much cheaper and smaller, a development that has made them a major part of any modern army’s equipment.
However, as with any form of technology, the rise of drones has led to the creation of a large number of companies trying to cash in on the boom in demand. Inevitably some of these lack the financial acumen or the engineering know-how to achieve their ambitions.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
A case in point is drone manufacturer Red Cat Holdings (Nasdaq: RCAT), which aims to make drones for the US military, as well as for other purposes, such as carrying out safety checks in places where it would be dangerous for people to go.
Has Red Cat jumped the gun?
At the end of last year, Red Cat’s shares more than quadrupled on the news that it had won a competition to supply one of its drones to the US Army. The hope was that this would bring in a large amount of revenue and potentially open the door to contracts with other forces. However, as Kerrisdale Capital point out, there are two problems with this optimistic scenario.
Firstly, the contract, which has yet to be agreed, is likely to be much smaller than the company projects. Demand from the Army (or other US government agencies, such as the Department of the Interior) for the type of drone that Red Cat is selling is likely to be very limited. A bigger long-term problem for Red Cat is that the market for drones is becoming extremely competitive, with a large number of firms keen to grab a share. This has caused the price of drones to start falling.
Several established companies are offering similar drones to those produced by Red Cat for a much lower price. Finally, even if Red Cat did win a large contract, it is an open question as to whether they could fulfil it. This is because the company’s attempts to ramp up production over the past few years have been bedevilled by numerous delays and missed targets, while it has also lost money every year for the last six years.
There is evidence that the hype surrounding Red Cat is already starting to fade away, as its share price has fallen by around 40% from its peak at the start of this year, and it is trading well below its 50-day moving average. As a result, I suggest shorting it at the current price of $8.92 at £150 per $1. In that case, cover your position at $14.92, which would leave you with a total downside of £900.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Which UK region has the most in savings? Average savings by areaThe amount people have in their savings differs from region to region in the UK. How does your nest egg compare to those living nearby?
-
Doug and Mary Perkins: Specsavers’ clear-sighted foundersHelped by the deregulation of the sector in the 1980s and brilliant advertising, Mary Perkins and her husband Doug have taken Specsavers to the top of the optometry market
-
Investment opportunities in the world of Coca-ColaThere is far more to Coca-Cola than just one giant firm. The companies that bottle and distribute the ubiquitous soft drink are promising investments in their own right.
-
Streaming services are the new magic money tree for investors – but for how long?Opinion Streaming services are in full bloom and laden with profits, but beware – winter is coming, warns Matthew Lynn
-
'Pension funds shouldn't be pushed into private equity sector'Opinion The private-equity party is over, so don't push pension funds into the sector, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Greg Abel: Warren Buffett’s heir takes the throneGreg Abel is considered a safe pair of hands as he takes centre stage at Berkshire Hathaway. But he arrives after one of the hardest acts to follow in investment history, Warren Buffett. Can he thrive?
-
Who will be the next Warren Buffett?Opinion There won’t be another Warren Buffett. Times have changed, and the opportunities are no longer there, says Matthew Lynn.
-
Will Comstock crash – or soar?Opinion The upside for Comstock, a solar panel-recycling and biomass-refining group, dwarfs the downside, says Dominic Frisby.
-
'As AGMs go digital, firms must offer a new form of scrutiny for shareholders'Opinion Technology has rendered big AGM meet-ups obsolete, but the board still needs to be held to account, says Matthew Lynn
-
Unilever braces for inflation amid tariff uncertainty – what does it mean for investors?Consumer-goods giant Unilever has made steady progress simplifying its operations. Will tariffs now cause turbulence?
