After Priips changes, investment trusts are due a rerating
Heavy-handed rules governing investment trust reporting, that put the sector at a disadvantage, are to go.
On 19 September 2024, the government and the Financial Conduct Authority, the City regulator, jointly declared that investment trusts would be excluded from European regulations affecting how their charges are reported. This move has been a long time coming. Campaigners have been arguing for years that the rules are being applied incorrectly and, as a result, are doing untold harm to the investment trust sector.
The regulations, known as Priips, had two major drawbacks. They forced investment companies to add corporate costs on top of their management charges in a reported “ongoing charge fee” as if they were paid directly by the shareholder. This in turn pushed up the figure investment managers had to report to clients when it came to the expense of managing their portfolios.
Priips were designed to clarify the cost of investing in funds for investors, illustrating the cost of fund management upfront on the key information document (KID), something funds were reluctant to do themselves. However, the rules effectively forced trusts to double-count the costs of management – hardly helpful, and not a good look when they have to compete against low-cost passive trackers.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The problem was most apparent in the alternative investment trusts sector. As closed-ended vehicles, investment trusts are perfectly designed for investing in illiquid assets. Still, the cost of managing these assets will always be higher than the cost of buying and selling securities. In some sectors, such as the real estate investment trust (REIT) market, there was even inconsistency between how companies interpreted the rules.
Analysts at corporate broker Deutsche Numis have called the Priips requirements “onerous, misleading and inconsistent”, and say they have had a “material impact on the sector”, notably in alternative asset classes such as listed private equity where “discounts have widened materially”. Following the changes, trusts can ignore the rules that have forced them to publish misleading KIDs, and investment managers can also overlook the requirement to report an aggregated cost of all investment trusts owned. The FCA and the government have committed to bringing in new rules in the first half of 2025.
Deutsche Numis has described the current rules as a “meaningful headwind for the sector”, owing to “artificially high KID costs”. However, following the changes, these investment companies could end up “back on the radar of these investors”, which could have a “meaningful impact on the sector over the short to mid-term”.
The trusts most likely to see an impact are those with the highest and most inflated KID figures. The private equity sector is the prime example. Oakley Capital Investments, for instance, has one of the highest reported cost ratios in the sector at 7.25%. These trusts are trading at large discounts to net asset value, and the removal of the Priips regime could be the first step in a rerating process.
Likely investment trust winners from the rule changes
The AVI Global Trust and MIGO Opportunities Trust are two alternative ways to play the trend. Asset Value Investors manage both.
AVI aims to achieve capital growth by acquiring undervalued assets, including investment trusts.
MIGO is more of an investment-trust specialist, although, at roughly a tenth of the size of AVI, the shares may not be suitable for all investors. Both trusts count Oakley as one of their top holdings, with 6.7% of AVI’s portfolio allocated to the private equity trust. Other top-ten holdings in the £1.3bn trust include News Corp, Japanese group Softbank and Cordiant Digital Infrastructure, another trust.
Cordiant Digital, a trust specialising in the infrastructure of the digital economy, is another example of the distorting impact of the Priips regime. Its KID has annual costs pegged at 2.03%, while the Association of Investment Companies has the figure at 0.9%. It could be another major beneficiary of the reforms.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Rupert is the former deputy digital editor of MoneyWeek. He's an active investor and has always been fascinated by the world of business and investing. His style has been heavily influenced by US investors Warren Buffett and Philip Carret. He is always looking for high-quality growth opportunities trading at a reasonable price, preferring cash generative businesses with strong balance sheets over blue-sky growth stocks.
Rupert has written for many UK and international publications including the Motley Fool, Gurufocus and ValueWalk, aimed at a range of readers; from the first timers to experienced high-net-worth individuals. Rupert has also founded and managed several businesses, including the New York-based hedge fund newsletter, Hidden Value Stocks. He has written over 20 ebooks and appeared as an expert commentator on the BBC World Service.
-
Investors pull money from UK equities as government warns of “painful” Budget
The government’s post-election honeymoon period has been short-lived, and investors are shying away from UK equities as a result
By Katie Williams Published
-
Top global fintech companies to invest in
One British fintech hogs the headlines, but there are two top performers in the US. We explain where you should put your money
By David C. Stevenson Published
-
Top trusts that offer growth at a discount
Professional investor Alastair Laing picks three trusts where he'd put his money
By Alastair Laing Published
-
Higher rates hamper Reits – are they still worth buying?
Shares in Reits have been under pressure and, as a result, discounts to net asset value are likely to persist for some time – focus on income over value
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
Top healthcare REITs for your portfolio
Healthcare REITs managing facilities, such as GP practices or hospitals, look appealing. Should you invest?
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
Two small cap investment trusts with growth potential
These two small cap investment trusts specialise in the market’s tiddlers and both are worth buying, says Max King.
By Max King Published
-
Are wealth-protection trusts any good?
Wealth-protection trusts have failed to live up to their reputation over the past few years. Can they stage a comeback?
By Rupert Hargreaves Published
-
How to invest in REITs in the UK and Europe
Investing in REITs can be a sensible alternative to buying property, but picking the right one is a challenge. Marcus Phayre-Mudge’s trust boasts commercial real estate experts with a proven record
By Max King Published
-
Canadian General Investments: should you buy?
Investors can profit from Canada's vast potential with Canadian General Investments, a top investment trust
By Max King Published
-
Emerging market investment trusts to buy
Emerging market investment trusts offer access to some of the world’s fastest-growing economies, says Max King
By Max King Published