The oil-price rebound has stalled
The post-lockdown rally in the oil price has now stalled, with prices down by 6% since the beginning of September

Are we heading for another oil-price slump? Benchmark Brent crude futures plunged to an 18-year low of around $19 a barrel in April, while US oil futures briefly went negative. Prices have since climbed out of the lockdown hole, with Brent trading around $45 a barrel over the summer. Yet the rally has now stalled, with prices down by 6% since 1 September to about $42.50 a barrel.
Global demand for oil is wobbly. A second wave of Covid-19 will see more people working from home, while lapsing government support programmes make for a shakier outlook for consumption and global trade. Global crude oil demand was roughly 100 million barrels per day (mbpd) in 2019, but is likely to be closer to 90 mbpd this year, according to forecasts by oil-exporters’ cartel Opec. In Japan, the world’s fourth-biggest crude importer, imports fell by more than 25% on the year in August, says Bozorgmehr Sharafedin in Reuters.
Bulls are looking to the supply side. The price crash has battered US shale oil, says Myles McCormick in the Financial Times. Upstream energy firms with a combined $85bn of debt have filed for bankruptcy protection over the last eight months. Many investors are “fed up” with the unprofitable sector and won’t bankroll further losses. US oil output peaked at 13 mbpd at the start of this year, but is currently below 11 mbpd says the Energy Information Administration.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Oil-Price War Two?
Yet reduced output will only gradually make a dent in the world’s swollen stockpiles. Countries such as China used the April price crash as an opportunity to fill up the national tank at a bargain price. Global inventories remain above historic levels and “spare capacity” in the supply chain is “at the highest levels in 25 years”, says Steve Goldstein in Barron’s.
April’s oil-price crash was triggered by a Saudi-Russian “price war”. Unable to agree on how to manage slumping demand amid the first wave of lockdowns, the two sides resorted to flooding the market with crude in an all-out effort to win market share.
After the price war, however, Opec+, a grouping led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, got its act together, cutting collective output by 9.7 mbpd in April compared with 2018 output levels. That move stabilised the market. Those cuts are being reduced, but still stand at 7.7 mbpd. Could we be in for a repeat performance? Riyadh and Moscow are split over how to manage the latest demand hit, says Julian Lee on Bloomberg. Russia prefers to wait and see, but the Saudis have called for a more “proactive and preemptive” approach that favours new cuts to keep prices buoyant. This is all strikingly similar to what happened in March. Don’t rule out “another showdown before the end of the year”.
Get the latest financial news, insights and expert analysis from our award-winning MoneyWeek team, to help you understand what really matters when it comes to your finances.
Alex is an investment writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2015. He has been the magazine’s markets editor since 2019.
Alex has a passion for demystifying the often arcane world of finance for a general readership. While financial media tends to focus compulsively on the latest trend, the best opportunities can lie forgotten elsewhere.
He is especially interested in European equities – where his fluent French helps him to cover the continent’s largest bourse – and emerging markets, where his experience living in Beijing, and conversational Chinese, prove useful.
Hailing from Leeds, he studied Philosophy, Politics and Economics at the University of Oxford. He also holds a Master of Public Health from the University of Manchester.
-
Reeves warned against property tax shake-up – 3 ways it could backfire on first-time buyers
Rachel Reeves reportedly has her eye on high-end property taxes in the upcoming Budget, but there are concerns a shake-up could unintentionally hamper those trying to get on the housing ladder
-
Average Brits want to retire five years before they can – who has the widest retirement gap?
Brits are expecting to work for longer than ever but there are big disparities in the number of extra working years predicted. A small tweak could help close the gap
-
Pierre-Édouard Stérin wants to make France great again
Conservative billionaire Pierre-Édouard Stérin is seeking to lead a political and spiritual renaissance across the Channel. The planning looks meticulous
-
Global investors have overlooked the top innovators in emerging markets
Opinion Carlos Hardenberg, portfolio manager, Mobius Investment Trust, highlights three emerging market stocks where he’d put his money
-
Pinewood Technologies: a drive for growth
Pinewood Technologies’ platform is one of the best in the business. Investors should buy in
-
'EV maker Faraday Future will crash'
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is failing dismally to live up to its name, says Matthew Partridge
-
Investors should cheer the coming nuclear summer
The US and UK have agreed a groundbreaking deal on nuclear power, and the sector is seeing a surge in interest from around the world. Here's how you can profit
-
8 of the best houses for sale with follies
The best houses for sale with follies in the grounds – from a five-storey Victorian Gothic tower in Tonbridge, Kent, to a former mill in Oxfordshire with gardens that include a folly on an island in a lake
-
A tale of two Reits – why performance matters for valuation
AEW UK and Regional are two Reits that are valued very differently, despite a shared focus on properties outside London
-
Healthcare stocks look cheap, but tread carefully
Shares in healthcare companies could get a shot in the arm if uncertainty over policy in the US wanes, but are they worth the risk?