Will the Federal Reserve give markets a shock this week?
With US inflation coming in higher than expected, markets are nervously awaiting the Federal Reserve’s response. John Stepek looks at what’s likely to happen.
The big economic event last week was US inflation data. In the end, it all panned out calmly. Inflation was a bit higher than expected, but markets shrugged it off.
This week’s big event is the Federal Reserve’s reaction to it all.
So what’s likely to happen, and what should you keep an eye out for?
The week’s biggest event
On Wednesday this week, the Federal Reserve announces its latest decision on monetary policy. In the UK, we’ll hear about it after the market’s closed for the day.
Investors will want to see what the Fed’s current thinking on inflation is. Is the Fed still comfortable with the idea that inflation is transitory? Or is it getting edgy? Will Jerome Powell say that it’s time to start thinking about tapering? Or will he wave it all away as nothing to worry about yet?
Like it or not, this could have a big market impact – in the short term at least. As I’ve said more than a few times in the past, it’s odd to think that so many prices in so many different markets all across the globe can be moved so sharply by the prognostications and eyebrow twitches of a handful of people in a room somewhere. But that’s the system we live with.
Clearly, we’re not mind readers and we have no crystal balls. And in the end, if you’re genuinely a long-term investor, this sort of event shouldn’t faze you. If your portfolio can’t endure the tiny bit of potential turbulence caused by a single economic data release, or an unexpected sentence in a Fed statement, then you need to revisit your strategy.
However, unless you plan to ignore the news entirely (I actually think this is a good strategy 99% of the time – it’s just one that a lot of people struggle to enact), then it’s useful to understand what’s going on.
When you have a rough idea of what to expect from various events, then it can help you to keep control of your own emotional reactions to swings in the market. If you can minimise the element of surprise, you can also minimise your propensity to panic.
So what’s the likely outcome here? When it comes to binary (or near-binary) decision making, you have to assume that people will take the path of least resistance. You just need to work out what that is.
The good news is that right now, it’s still pretty obvious.
Always pick the path of least resistance
There are really only two options here. Option one is that the Fed could start talking tough on inflation, and saying that it wants to tighten monetary policy earlier than markets expect. Option two is that the Fed keeps to its “we’ll watch and wait” mantra.
Inflation is becoming more of a talking point. It’s very clear that there are cost pressures out there. However, it’s also very far from clear that it’s a long-term problem. I think it will be, but that’s certainly not the consensus view right now, either in markets or in the press.
And loath as I am to admit it, that’s perfectly reasonable. There is more than enough confusion in the data to allow room for debate. You can still make the case that inflation will be “transitory” (and there are still quite a few smart people who reckon we’re in for yet another deflationary dip – I’m not in that camp but I respect many of those who are).
You just need to look at the reaction to last week’s higher-than-expected inflation data to realise that markets are currently willing to believe that this is temporary. Gold is drifting lower. US bond yields actually fell (you’d expect them to rise if inflation was really viewed as a long-term issue).
So here’s what could happen.
If the Fed goes for option one, markets will panic, the dollar will strengthen and most other things will go down, including the US stockmarket. And interest rates might well spike (at first) which is the last thing they want.
They’ll get push back from “opinion formers” too. People will wonder why the Fed is already talking about tightening when unemployment – which it says is the priority – is still so high. The Fed will have to explain its views. It’ll be like kicking a hornets’ nest.
If the Fed goes for option two, then markets will remain broadly on their current path, which for most markets is either meandering around, or steadily edging higher. The opinion formers will be calm. The Fed won’t have to explain anything – it’s easy to stick to the “transitory” argument for a while yet.
In short, the Fed can easily kick this debate along the road until at least the depths of summer. It can then use the annual central bankers’ conference at Jackson Hole to start warming markets up to a “taper” if it feels it necessary to do so.
Which of those options is the path of least resistance? Option two, clearly. So your only real concern there is whether Powell speaks with enough “dovish” intonation to keep markets calm. I suspect he’ll err on that side of things – he’s had enough practice by now.
Indeed, if we get any surprises at all I imagine it’ll be that the communication is even more relaxed than anyone expects. But we’ll see what happens on the day.
And if you haven’t already subscribed to MoneyWeek magazine, get your first six issues free here.