The rise and fall of Sam Bankman-Fried – the “boy wonder of crypto”
Why the fate of Sam Bankman-Fried reminds us to be wary of digital tokens and unregulated financial intermediaries.
As the “boy wonder of crypto”, Sam Bankman-Fried “got richer faster than almost anyone in history, amassing an estimated $26bn in personal wealth”, appearing on countless magazine covers, and rubbing shoulders with the rich and powerful, says the BBC.
SBF, as he is known, was never shy about it: he wanted to get rich. “An overachieving child born to two overachieving parents,” SBF studied at MIT and fell under the spell of “effective altruism” – the idea that making as much money as you can, so you can give it away, is the best way to be charitable. At the age of 25, he founded Alameda Research to exploit arbitrage opportunities in cryptocurrencies. In 2019, he founded FTX, an exchange for digital tokens. Within months, the volume of daily trading hit $300m.
His fall from grace was equally rapid. On 7 November 2022, a rival executive expressed concern about FTX’s finances, sparking a multibillion-dollar bank run. in November 2023, following 15 days of testimony, a jury took only four and a half hours to find him guilty of defrauding his customers and lenders, and of conspiring with others to commit securities fraud, commodities fraud and money laundering, says The Economist.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Just months into its existence, Alameda was borrowing customers’ deposits for its own purposes. To prove fraud, the prosecution often needed simply to use SBF’s own words against him. At one point his lawyer asked if a document was being offered for its truth. “Your honour, it’s the defendant’s own statements... No, it’s not being offered for its truth,” the prosecutor said. SBF faces further charges in a trial scheduled for March and a maximum sentence of 110 years.
Still, SBF has provided investors and the financial system with “a valuable service”, says Bloomberg. Millions of “crypto believers” have entrusted their money to unregulated financial intermediaries that “don’t face the same requirements for safety [and] soundness... that banks and stock exchanges do”. Most of the tokens being traded are “fundamentally worthless”.
FTX’s collapse has brought such truths to light. The hope is that legislators and regulators will now step in. In the meantime, just three letters might serve to warn people away: FTX.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
Related articles
- Lloyds Bank warning: Crypto scams rise as investors seek high returns
- Three cryptocurrency funds for the adventurous investor
- Why bitcoin will never eclipse gold
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Jane writes profiles for MoneyWeek and is city editor of The Week. A former British Society of Magazine Editors editor of the year, she cut her teeth in journalism editing The Daily Telegraph’s Letters page and writing gossip for the London Evening Standard – while contributing to a kaleidoscopic range of business magazines including Personnel Today, Edge, Microscope, Computing, PC Business World, and Business & Finance.
She has edited corporate publications for accountants BDO, business psychologists YSC Consulting, and the law firm Stephenson Harwood – also enjoying a stint as a researcher for the due diligence department of a global risk advisory firm.
Her sole book to date, Stay or Go? (2016), rehearsed the arguments on both sides of the EU referendum.
She lives in north London, has a degree in modern history from Trinity College, Oxford, and is currently learning to play the drums.
-
Rightmove: Autumn Budget pushed down asking prices but values will rise in 2025
Asking prices dipped by more than usual in October amid fears of tax rises
By Marc Shoffman Published
-
Investing in a dangerous world: key takeaways from the MoneyWeek Summit
If you couldn’t get a ticket to MoneyWeek’s summit, here’s an overview of what you missed
By MoneyWeek Published
-
Investing in a dangerous world: key takeaways from the MoneyWeek Summit
If you couldn’t get a ticket to MoneyWeek’s summit, here’s an overview of what you missed
By MoneyWeek Published
-
DCC: a top-notch company going cheap
DCC has a stellar long-term record and promising prospects. It has been unfairly marked down
By Jamie Ward Published
-
Sri Mulyani Indrawati: Indonesia’s Iron Lady
Keeping Sri Mulyani Indrawati on as Indonesia's finance minister has steadied the ship after the election of a former military general spooked financial markets
By Jane Lewis Published
-
How investors can use options to navigate a turbulent world
Explainer Options can be a useful solution for investors to protect and grow their wealth in volatile times.
By James Proudlock Published
-
Media mogul James Dolan takes straight shot at the limelight
Controversial media mogul James Dolan has been hailed as a visionary for his Sphere arena in Las Vegas. But can he square the circle financially?
By Jane Lewis Published
-
Invest in Hilton Foods: a tasty UK food supplier
Hilton Foods is a keenly priced opportunity in an unglamorous sector
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published
-
HSBC stocks jump – is its cost-cutting plan already paying off?
HSBC's reorganisation has left questions unanswered, but otherwise the banking sector is in robust health
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published
-
Do we need central banks, or is it time to privatise money?
Analysis Free banking is one alternative to central banks, but would switching to a radical new system be worth the risk?
By Stuart Watkins Published