“In pursuit of their juvenile, half-witted anti-colonialism”, Labour has “betrayed our strategic interests, delighted our enemies, weakened our alliance with the US”, let down the Chagossian people and set a “terrifying precedent” for the British populations of Gibraltar and the Falkland Islands, says Daniel Hannan in The Telegraph.
Diego Garcia, the largest of the Chagos Islands (which foreign secretary David Lammy ceded to Mauritius last week “without bothering to inform MPs”, notes The Times), is “the Malta of the Indian Ocean, occupying a perfect strategic position” within reach of “four of the seven global chokepoints that funnel maritime traffic”. The Anglo-American base built after 1968 has “proved its military value again and again”.
Under the treaty of transfer, the UK will pay Mauritius rent for a 99-year lease, but 99 years is an “eye blink to China” and in the meantime, Mauritius may lease neighbouring islets to the world’s fastest-growing naval power. “China, which sees Mauritius as its key regional ally, is goggling at us with incredulous glee.”
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
What role have the Tories played?
Tories have been raging at Lammy even though it was James Cleverly, the former foreign secretary, who “started the ball-rolling” on talks in 2022, says Stephen Bush in the Financial Times.
The fact is that Mauritius is not part of China’s Belt and Road Initiative and it seems more likely that the situation will stay that way if the UK is paying its rent than if it isn’t and “insisting that it is not going to honour its half-a century-old promise” (in 1965, London detached the Chagos from the soon-to-be independent Mauritius, pledging to return them when they were no longer of use to the US military).
Indeed, the recent deal has “rather more continuity” with the Tories’ approach to the islands than Labour’s, implying that the rage of some Tories mostly stems from a self-interested desire to “censure the government no matter what”.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
How to invest in nuclear powerWe need nuclear power to go green, says Dominic Frisby. But there is a better option than huge power stations
-
Keir Starmer's 100 days in office: chaos and miseryKeir Starmer has achieved 100 days in office. The bumbling and grasping prime minister needs a guiding mission
-
Can Lebanon's struggling economy survive another war?Lebanon's economy has been in dire straits for decades, and now it is yet again on the brink of war. Are better times on the horizon?
-
How much does the prime minister get paid?
How much does the prime minister get paid and should he get more?
-
Why Labour sleaze mattersLabour has come under the spotlight for accepting over £800,000 in gifts. Is this just crony politics as usual?
-
Modi’s reforms set Indian stocks on fireIndian stocks pass a new milestone, but global fund managers are holding back. Are there signs of overheating?
-
How to improve economic output using the supply-side approachBoosting potential economic output through public investment is crucial, says David C. Stevenson
-
Anders Holch Povlsen: the Danish tycoon reshaping BritainAnders Holch Povlsen has snapped up land in the Highlands, returning it to a wilderness, and plans to transform a historic department store in Edinburgh. Can he also revive Topshop?
