Recently, Walgreens Boots Alliance struck a deal with private-equity group Sycamore Partners that will “bring the struggling pharmacy chain’s century-long run as a public company to an end”, says the Financial Times. Sycamore agreed to pay $11.45 a share, a premium of almost 30% to the price before news of a possible deal emerged in December. Sycamore is valuing the business, including its debt, at $23.7 billion. Billionaire Stefano Pessina, Walgreens’ executive chairman and largest shareholder, will maintain a “sizeable minority shareholding” in the business.
Despite retaining a stake, the deal is a blow for Pessina. He “spent half a century building a pharmacy behemoth that stretches almost three times further than the Roman empire ever did”, says Benjamin Katz in The Wall Street Journal. After turning around and expanding his father’s “fledgling and failing pharmaceutical wholesaler”, he merged it with UniChem in 1997 and bought Boots in 2006. That combination was in turn acquired by Walgreens in 2014, creating a conglomerate with a peak market value in excess of $100 billion. However, it struggled with Amazon “quickly eating into drugstores’ non-medical revenues”. This forced it to cancel its dividend and slash the store’s portfolio.
What does the Walgreens sale mean for Boots?
Walgreens proved unable to deal with the challenges posed by both Amazon and “big-box retailers, such as Walmart and Target”, says Chris Isidore on CNN; “lower reimbursement rates for prescription drugs” in the United States hardly helped matters. However, despite claims that Sycamore’s “strong... record of successful retail turnarounds” will help turn Walgreens around, “retail’s graveyard is full of the bones of many once-dominant retailers who closed up shop after being bought by private-equity firms”. At the very least, “the fundamental problems leading to the private-equity purchase” won’t go away after this deal.
MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The fact that Sycamore is using up to $12 billion of leverage to push through the deal will make it even harder for Walgreen’s “miserable decade” to be reversed, says Robert Cyran for Breakingviews. The added debt (assuming a 10% interest rate) will more than double Walgreen’s interest payments, eating into the $1.8 billion in operating profit it is currently making – sharply down from $7 billion in 2018. Far from buying the company to turn it around, Sycamore seems to be aiming at “dismantling it further by splitting out units [such as] Boots”.
The sale “could lay the groundwork for Boots to be relisted or sold out from under its parent”, says Laith Al-Khalaf in The Sunday Times. It makes “little commercial sense” for a US retailer to “retain a UK-centric pharmacy”, especially since there is a feeling that the parent company “has chronically underinvested in Boots”. Still, with 8.1% like-for-like sales growth in the latest quarter, and 15 quarters of rising market share, Boots “is very important for Walgreens”. Sycamore may decide that the best bet is for Boots to remain part of the overall group.
This article was first published in MoneyWeek's magazine. Enjoy exclusive early access to news, opinion and analysis from our team of financial experts with a MoneyWeek subscription.
-
Nationwide promises to protect all its branches from closures until at least 2030The building society has extended its pledge to keep all high street Nationwide and Virgin Money branches open, now until at least 2030.
-
Could dividend tax nearly double in the Budget?Self-employed directors and investors, including pensioners, who get an income from company shares would be hit if the rumoured move to hike dividend tax goes ahead.
-
'We still live in Alan Greenspan’s shadow'When MoneyWeek launched 25 years ago, Alan Greenspan was chairman of the Federal Reserve. We’re still living with the consequences of the whirlwind he sowed
-
Go for growth: how to invest in emerging marketsDeveloping countries offer investors compelling long-term economic prospects, says David Prosser
-
Isaac Newton's golden legacy – how the English polymath created the gold standard by accidentIsaac Newton brought about a new global economic era by accident, says Dominic Frisby
-
Why MoneyWeek studies at the Austrian school of economicsA heterodox tradition in economics has been a guiding light for MoneyWeek over our 25 years, says Stuart Watkins
-
MoneyWeek's best calls of the last 25 years – the key trends we got rightFrom the early days of the gold bull market and the credit crunch to the advent of populism and post-Covid inflation, MoneyWeek has made some excellent calls
-
'How I brought MoneyWeek to the masses'Launching MoneyWeek gave ordinary investors information – and hence power, says Merryn Somerset Webb
-
'Why I launched MoneyWeek'Inspired by The Week and uninspired by the financial press, Jolyon Connell decided it was time for a new venture. That's where MoneyWeek came in
-
'My predictions for the next 25 years'Opinion What will the world look like when MoneyWeek celebrates its 50th birthday? Matthew Lynn shares his predictions
