Botched meddling in an emotive issue
George Osborne has declared a freeze on the inheritance tax threshold until 2019. A revenue-raising masterstroke or a political blunder? Emily Hohler reports.
In the last tax year, just 19,000 estates incurred inheritance tax. That's barely 3% of all deaths. Freezing the £325,000 inheritance tax (IHT) threshold until 2019, as George Osborne has just announced, will increase the annual total by perhaps 5,000, meaning that IHT will still only affect around 4% of estates.
The £200m-a year-extra this is expected to provide will pay 20% of the bill for the new long-term care system, which the government says will help around 100,000 people who would have had to pay for social care.
Surely this is sensible public policy and smart politics? Unfortunately not, says James Kirkup in The Daily Telegraph. Inheritance tax is an emotive issue. Some fear wrongly that they will be affected. Many others disagree on principle.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
They don't think that the state should interfere with a parent's desire to help a child; they are angry that assets bought with taxed income should be taxed again; and angry that the very rich avoid the tax through clever tax planning.
If anyone should understand this reaction, it's George Osborne, says Isabel Oakeshott in The Sunday Times. Much of his reputation as a master political strategist was built on his announcement in 2007 that a Tory government would raise the IHT threshold to £1m. Yet the £325,000 limit has not been raised since April 2009.
Nor should we forget that just eight weeks ago Osborne promised to increase it in two years' time. His latest decision not to raise it until at least 2019 will leave thousands £95,000 worse off.
But let's not forget the figures that really matter, says Polly Toynbee in The Guardian. The headlines about the middle-class families' that will be hit are misleading and deliberately conflate "the interests of the very few with the interests of the genuine middle'".
Hardly anyone is rich enough to pay inheritance tax, yet every average home owner (price £250,000) is "falsely stirred up to fear inheritance tax so that they will support the rich in their never-ending fight to avoid it".
The scheme is actually rather neat, says an editorial in the same newspaper. It means that "recipients of inherited wealth as a whole will contribute towards the new protection for estates that would otherwise be entirely eaten up by nursing home bills".
It is, of course, right that those too poor to pay for care either because they never inherited any money or because they have been paid low salaries all their lives should be helped, says Melanie Phillips in the Daily Mail. But it isn't right that those who have "frittered away their money" should have their residential care fully funded by responsible people who have worked hard and saved all their lives, and who want to help their children.
Such prudence should be encouraged, not penalised, says Phillips. Demographics dictate that the welfare gap will continue to widen and standards to fall. This must be addressed. But the government wastes billions: it is "insufferable", for instance, to claim it cannot afford to fund residential care when the annual overseas aid budget is nearly £12bn.
"The civilised solution is surely to lower the rate of income tax and introduce universal social insurance by which people must pay into insurance schemes to cover the cost of long-term care."
Emily has extensive experience in the world of journalism. She has worked on MoneyWeek for more than 20 years as a former assistant editor and writer. Emily has previously worked on titles including The Times as a Deputy Features Editor, Commissioning Editor at The Independent Sunday Review, The Daily Telegraph, and she spent three years at women's lifestyle magazine Marie Claire as a features writer for three years, early on in her career.
On MoneyWeek, Emily’s coverage includes Brexit and global markets such as Russia and China. Aside from her writing, Emily is a Nutritional Therapist and she runs her own business called Root Branch Nutrition in Oxfordshire, where she offers consultations and workshops on nutrition and health.
-
FTSE 100 hits record highs – why is it rising and will we see more gains?
Advice UK equities have been described as unloved for a long time but as the FTSE 100 hits new highs, we explain if now is the time to buy British.
By Marc Shoffman Published
-
How to invest in copper
It may be time to invest in copper as the red metal appears poised for a big jump. Dominic Frisby looks at what should investors should buy
By Dominic Frisby Published