Trump fires first shots in trade war

Donald Trump has fired the first shots in a US-China trade war, slapping tariffs on $34bn of Chinese imports, with another $16bn to follow soon.

Harley's move to Europe: an unintended consequence of US protectionism

President Donald Trump "has fired the first shots in a US-China trade war", says Fidelity's Tom Stevenson in The Daily Telegraph. He has imposed tariffs on $34bn of Chinese imports, with another $16bn to follow soon. China says it will respond in kind, and Trump has now raised the prospect of duties on all $500bn of Chinese imports. "Add in the threats he has levelled" at Europe and Canada, and "the potential for a $1trn trade war is clear to see".

Advertisement - Article continues below

Let's not panic just yet, say Will Denyer and Tan Kai Xian in a Gavekal Research note. The US government's recent tariffs on steel and aluminium imports, in conjunction with those on $34bn of China's goods, will merely raise the effective US tariff rate on overall imports from 1.4%, the average figure since 2000, to just 2.2%. Decades of global trade liberalisation have gradually reduced the figure from 10% in 1945.

So it wouldn't be much of a reversal. And keep in mind that businesses and consumers can substitute Chinese imports with products from other countries to some extent, while some will be able to shift to domestically produced alternatives.

Beware the indirect effects

This is partly why estimates of the impact of the tariffs are not especially worrying. The tariffs will reduce US GDP by only 0.03% in the third quarter of 2018, according to an estimate by Moody's Analytics, which isn't much for an economy worth $20trn. Similarly, JPMorgan notes that the first round of US tariffs apply only to 2% of China's exports, says Christopher Beddor on Breakingviews. And even the drag on the Chinese economy from 25% levies on all Chinese exports to the US wouldn't be that bad. JPMorgan reckons that China's growth in those circumstances would slow by a mere 0.5%.

Advertisement - Article continues below

The trouble is, however, that modelling the damage is hardly an exact science, says The Wall Street Journal's Justin Lahart. Consider, for example, Harley Davidson's announcement that it will shift production to Europe from the US to avoid the EU's tariffs on its motorbikes. "A typical economic model" might predict lower sales owing to the tariff, but it wouldn't foresee a wholesale move offshore, which implies a bigger reduction in GDP. Gauging the impact of uncertainty and confidence is tricky too. In modern supply chains unfinished goods are imported and exported several times during the manufacturing process, so the effect of tariffs would be magnified.

Stocks are starting to shake

This sort of calculation is unnerving equity investors, explaining why US and Chinese stocks have "swooned", says Beddor. Some American companies have said they are reducing or delaying investment because of the trade outlook. That will undermine earnings growth soon. Stockmarket slides also damage overall economic confidence. Many economists may not be too worried yet but equities are beginning to sense just how ugly this could get.




How long can the good times roll?

Despite all the doom and gloom that has dominated our headlines for most of 2019, Britain and most of the rest of the developing world is currently en…
19 Dec 2019

The British equity market is shrinking

British startups are abandoning public stockmarkets and turning to deep-pocketed Silicon Valley venture capitalists for their investment needs.
8 Nov 2019

There are lots of reasons to be bearish – but you should stick with the bulls

There are plenty of reasons to be gloomy about the stockmarkets. But the trend remains up, says Dominic Frisby. And you don’t want to bet against the …
17 Jul 2019

Good news on jobs scares US stockmarkets

June brought the best monthly US jobs growth of the year, but stockmarkets were not best pleased.
11 Jul 2019

Most Popular

EU Economy

Here’s why investors should care about the EU’s plan to tackle Covid-19

The EU's €750bn rescue package makes a break-up of the eurozone much less likely. John Stepek explains why the scheme is such a big deal, and what it …
28 May 2020
Industrial metals

Governments’ money-printing mania bodes well for base metals

Money is being printed like there is no tomorrow. Much of it will be used to pay for infrastructure projects – and that will be good for metals, says …
27 May 2020

In support of active fund management

We’re fans of passive investing here at MoneyWeek. But active fund management has its place too, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
25 May 2020