Bond yields give mixed messages
The gap between the yield on US ten-year Treasury bonds and the yield on two-year bonds is a mere 0.5 – the narrowest it's been since 2007. What should we make of this?
"Round numbers would be irrelevant if investors were rational," says The Economist. "But they are not." Last week, for the first time in over four years, the yield on the ten-year US Treasury-bond surpassed 3%, reflecting falling prices, "and investors shuddered".
The move was deemed further evidence that the long bond bull market, which began in the early 1980s, is definitively over. As we embark on an era of higher long-term interest rates, corporate and consumer borrowing costs will rise, tempering growth. Given the unprecedented debt load the world economy is carrying, this could lead to a sharp slowdown, especially if rates rise quickly.
The overall pick up in rates "is easy enough to explain", as the Financial Times says. The US Federal Reserve has signalled that it will keep raising short-term interest rates, while a big fiscal stimulus is being added to an already buoyant economy, raising inflation expectations (bad news for bonds as rising prices erode the value of fixed income). But what's rather odd is that the ten-year yield hasn't gone up much compared with the two-year one.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
![https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg](https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748-320-80.jpg)
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
The gap between them is a mere 0.5%; it hasn't been this narrow since 2007. A flat yield curve typically implies low inflation and sluggish growth years into the future. What to make of the mixed messages?
QE has distorted the market
One possibility is the market is expecting short-term rates to rise amid Fed rate hikes but thinks that the Fed will thereby damage longer-term growth in the overly indebted economy, leading to a recession or stagnation.
But perhaps more likely, says John Authers in the Financial Times, is that after years of artificial interference in the bond market in the form of central-bank quantitative easing (QE), which involved buying bonds with printed money, we can't really read anything much at all into the flat curve. Other central banks are still suppressing their yields by buying bonds, prompting pension funds, "desperate to buy at a decent yield", to exploit any uptick in US yields, sending them down again.
For now the key is to keep an eye on inflation. If it surges, it could turn an orderly rise in bond yields into a "rout", damaging growth as companies and households face a steep rise in bills. Worryingly, not only is the labour market gradually tightening, but the US economy is facing capacity constraints that imply higher prices, says Irwin Stelzer in The Sunday Times. The backlog of orders for US manufactured goods is at a 14-year high, and firms are missing skilled drivers to shift goods from warehouses. In Europe, companies are complaining about equipment shortages. We may soon hear a lot more about round numbers in the bond market.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Andrew is the editor of MoneyWeek magazine. He grew up in Vienna and studied at the University of St Andrews, where he gained a first-class MA in geography & international relations.
After graduating he began to contribute to the foreign page of The Week and soon afterwards joined MoneyWeek at its inception in October 2000. He helped Merryn Somerset Webb establish it as Britain’s best-selling financial magazine, contributing to every section of the publication and specialising in macroeconomics and stockmarkets, before going part-time.
His freelance projects have included a 2009 relaunch of The Pharma Letter, where he covered corporate news and political developments in the German pharmaceuticals market for two years, and a multiyear stint as deputy editor of the Barclays account at Redwood, a marketing agency.
Andrew has been editing MoneyWeek since 2018, and continues to specialise in investment and news in German-speaking countries owing to his fluent command of the language.
-
Will Labour scrap the British ISA?
While it was the brainchild of the Conservatives, the British ISA received little love and now it seems Rachel Reeves may scrap the idea altogether. What does this mean for the ISA landscape?
By Kalpana Fitzpatrick Published
-
Direct Line returns to profit but loses almost 500,000 customers - here is what it means
Direct Line posted a pre-tax profit of £61.6m for the six months to June 30, compared to losses of more than £75m a year ago - what does it mean for the insurance sector?
By Chris Newlands Published