What part of your income do you view as taxable? The correct answer (whether you like it or not) is, beyond your personal allowances, all of it. Yet, says HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), 54% of those who use "sharing sites" do not see it as a potentially taxable activity. To them, it is merely "extra money".
There are various reasons why this might be, but the two main ones are lack of knowledge (most people have always had an employer as a middle man, so have no idea why or how to engage directly with the taxman) and dishonesty ("there will be a minority who try to avoid paying their fair share", says the Treasury).
Both groups might soon be in for a shock. This week, the Treasury announced a consultation into how it can help these platforms to "support" users to pay their taxes, perhaps by having them report their income direct to HMRC to chase the tax due, or by forcing them to deduct cash at source.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
There are plenty of ways to do this in Estonia, you can opt in to have your data recorded and "pre-populated on your tax return"; in Belgium, sites have to withhold a flat 10% on transactions. Either way, I think we can be sure of an encouraging (and sorely needed see this week's issue for details on the Spring Statement) rise in tax receipts once a new system is agreed.
Still, those using the sharing economy aren't the only ones about to find themselves paying a tad more tax than they say they think is due: their facilitators are in the firing line too. As they stand, says the government, the tax affairs of the big technology firms threaten to "undermine the fairness, sustainability and public acceptability of the corporate tax system". This is "a challenge that needs to be solved".
It is also one that can be solved HMRC's latest position paper on the matter suggests (as MoneyWeek often has in the past!) that we should tax the revenues of firms operating in the UK rather than (as is usually the case) just their (shiftable and manipulable) profits.
All of this should (to the extent that anything to do with tax can) be seen as good news. Firstly, Philip Hammond is consulting very widely on these issues the lack of sudden announcements and gimmicks in his statement this week was a joy. But it is also because the UK needs a long-term tax plan.
The burden on low- and middle-income groups is constantly being cut (witness the ever-rising income-tax allowance) and, contrary to popular belief, "the rich" cannot fund everything Britain's needy electorate demands.
So, barring a sudden (and impossibly unlikely) cut to the size of the state, HMRC does have to be clear on where the money will come from. Making sure the digital economy pays its way is an obvious part of the answer. If you make money from it, be ready to pay more in tax than you do at the moment. If HMRC gets its way (and it usually does), you are going to have to.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Why we need to get a grip on our governmentEditor's letter Our government is trying to do too much, enacting policies that are destructive to the private sector. It needs to drop the the feel-good nonsense and create policies that lead to long-term wealth, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
