The UK is to pay a Brexit bill. Lots of people are upset. Extreme leavers reckon we shouldn't have to pay a penny, on the basis that there is no legal reason to do so. Extreme remainers are upset, because as far as they can see, the only tiny upside to Brexit is a small up-front cash saving to serve as a mini-buffer to the financial apocalypse they (still) have no doubt is on the way.
Here at MoneyWeek, we aren't much bothered. Regular readers will know that we worry endlessly about the public finances (for a hint as to why, see James Ferguson's analysis piece). But this Brexit bill doesn't make things much worse. First, if the final bill does turn out to be in the region of €45bn-€55bn (£38bn-£48bn no figure has been confirmed), this really isn't much in the great scheme of the UK's public finances. It's significantly less than the (far too much) we spend on the interest on our debt every year; it is not much more than a third of what we spend on paying the state pension in the UK every year; and it adds up to around 2.5% of one year of our GDP.
Second, it isn't to be paid as a lump sum (apparently remember this is all pretty vague at the moment), but for the transition period (that's about £9bn a year for two years, if we assume that our annual bill in transition is the same as our annual bill now) and then in dribs and drabs as the bills for things we have agreed to during our membership arrive (all those expensive pensions for example). That makes it rather more palatable than it might have been.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Third, even this sum will shortly leave quite a cash buffer: it adds up to four to five years' worth of our current payments. Since 2000 we have paid the EU more than €100bn more than we have received back. Finally, it comes to about £600 per person or 7% of a bitcoin. We haven't been commenting much on Brexit here for a while. The process involves an overlay of press hysteria and an underlay of steady admin completion which makes most comment pointless and we have also been assuming a fairly straightforward result since the referendum last year.
What's on the cards? A wind-down of our contributions in the region now being suggested (something we think of as being something of a kindness to an EU that really can't cope with a hole in its budget just now). A fairly all-encompassing trade deal, alongside a freedom of movement deal that limits tax credits and welfare to new arrivals (again, see James Ferguson on why this matters). A sensible agreement on Ireland. And in the end, a new relationship with the EU that respects both sovereignty and the economy on both sides. So far so good.
-
Could investing in sugar protect you during a downturn?Sugar has some defensive qualities during economic downturns, but is now the right time to invest in sugar?
-
Trump’s tariffs: how should the UK respond?Every right-thinking person knows that free trade is a surer route to the wealth of nations than protectionism. So, what is Trump thinking?
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Everything is getting more expensive – including moneyEditor's letter Investors are about to start feeling rather more pain, says Merryn Somerset Webb – from the rising price of money.
-
We may be heading for recession – and it will be no ordinary recessionEditor's letter Just as the downturn in 2020 was not a typical recession. the next downturn could be very different too, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
What companies should be prioritising this decadeEditor's letter In a world beset by uncertainty, companies should be prioritising slack over efficiency, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Inflation could soon start to hurtEditor's letter Inflation is not going away. And with people's wages not keeping up, things are going to start to hurt, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
