Osborne’s new Golden Rules

George Osborne's plans for a budget surplus is a political ploy to trap Labour.

The chancellor's "new settlement" for the public finances is a "political ploy", says Martin Wolf in the FT. In order for the government to achieve an overall fiscal surplus without taxes being raised (there is also a planned law not to raise the main rates of income tax, national insurance and value added tax until 2020), spending must first be cut, and then kept level relative to GDP, which has been achieved only twice in the past 70 years.

If Labour supports the ploy, Labour embraces the concept of a relatively small state. If it opposes it, it is condemned as a tax-and-spend profligate. But politics aside, this "obsession" with public debt is unhealthy. Public borrowing is not always an evil: it is quite appropriate to borrow to invest and it makes more sense to cut debt when the economy is booming and interest rates aren't on "the floor".

Budget deficits are common all over the world and aren't necessarily a problem, agrees Jon Stone in The Independent. In Britain, budget surpluses have been "the exception ratherthan the rule since Britain's economy was dominated by free-market liberalism".

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Since 1948, there have only been 12 surplus years. Still, this isn't in itself a "mad idea" and Osborne isn't the first chancellor to "seek comfort in rules", says an editorial in The Independent. Remember Gordon Brown's "Golden Rule" (which he then broke)?

Nigel Lawson had a balanced-budget rule. Geoffrey Howe had the Medium-Term Financial Strategy. All passed into history. Osborne's instincts may be "sound", but we can't anticipate "unknown unknowns". If, for instance, Britain faced deflation and the economy badly needed a stimulus, it would make little sense to run a budget surplus.

Not that an imminent budget surplus is likely, says Jeremy Warner in The Daily Telegraph. The Treasury looks to deliver one by 2018/2019, but given the overly rosy view of the economic outlook and the pressures brought to bear by our ageing population, Osborne will probably still be promising that "elusive balanced budget" when he heads for the polls in 2020.

Emily Hohler

Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.

Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.