Is Clinton the right candidate for the Democrats?

While Hillary Clinton's foreign policy credentials are impressive, where she stands in domestic terms is rather less clear.

Emily Hohler
By
published
in Features

After two years of speculation, Hillary Clinton's announcement of her intention to seek the Democratic nomination for next year's US presidential election was "hardly a surprise", says The Daily Telegraph. And since she is so far ahead of her rivals, there seems little doubt that she will be the party's candidate.

But while she is a "determined character, a doughty fighter and undeniably impressive woman", she may not be the best choice, says Ian Birrell in The Independent on Sunday.

For all her fame, it's still unclear what she stands for in domestic terms. She has "barely spoken" on economic matters, and when she has, it shifts according to her audience. The picture is "less fuzzy" on foreign policy she is a hawk but this "does not make her a more promising president".

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

Worse, she symbolises how "dynastic" US politics is becoming. It is "shocking" that a nation of 320 million people may be about to be offered a choice between a second Clinton and a third Bush.

Yet Hillary's experience she has served as first lady for eight years, US senator for eight years and Secretary of State for four is valuable, says James Rubin in The Sunday Times. She has endured "unparalleled" scrutiny and is a "master of the policy process".

Given how "extraordinarily effective" the US political system has become at blocking progress, this is crucial. There is nobody in either party who has her "savvy when it comes to overcoming obstacles and political adversity".

Ignore any personality-based analyses, says Paul Krugman in The New York Times. "There has never been a time in American history" when the candidates mattered less. Each party is quite unified on major policy issues and there is a gulf between their positions.

Indeed, the differences between the parties are "so clear and dramatic" that it's hard to see how anyone could be "undecided even now, or be induced to change his or her mind between now and the election".

Emily Hohler
Emily Hohler
Politics editor

Emily has worked as a journalist for more than thirty years and was formerly Assistant Editor of MoneyWeek, which she helped launch in 2000. Prior to this, she was Deputy Features Editor of The Times and a Commissioning Editor for The Independent on Sunday and The Daily Telegraph. She has written for most of the national newspapers including The Times, the Daily and Sunday Telegraph, The Evening Standard and The Daily Mail, She interviewed celebrities weekly for The Sunday Telegraph and wrote a regular column for The Evening Standard. As Political Editor of MoneyWeek, Emily has covered subjects from Brexit to the Gaza war.

Aside from her writing, Emily trained as Nutritional Therapist following her son's diagnosis with Type 1 diabetes in 2011 and now works as a practitioner for Nature Doc, offering one-to-one consultations and running workshops in Oxfordshire.

Latest