I once wrote an editor's letter here that wasn't very nice about Warren Buffett. I got hate mail. I've steered relatively clear of the subject ever since (regular readers will know how much I dislike upsetting people). So I'm pleased to see that Bill Bonner has taken up the subject in his column this week.
He points out that, while there is no doubt that Buffett has been one of the most successful investors ever, his style looks like it has run out of steam. Since 2000 his returns, as one of our US colleagues puts it, "have been extremely poor".
Why? Part of the reason comes down to the fact that Buffett's biggest (and most well-known) early successes involved value investments: companies bought cheaply and left to thrive in a fabulous corporate environment (falling interest rates, spendthrift baby boomers, a falling share of national income going to workers and falling taxation). This doesn't really exist any more.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Quantitative easing (QE), near-zero rates and the endless search for yield have left almost all markets rather more expensive than they should be and the corporate environment is on the turn too.
There's no way that anyone could claim that there's any value in the US market, for example: both the Cape and Tobin's Q, the two best long-term valuation metrics, show equities as being very overvalued.
And according to one of our favourite strategists, Peter Bennett at Walker Crips, if you look at the median trailing price/earnings ratio for the US, you'll see that it is as "overvalued as the big daddy of them all 2000".
This horrible overpricing of stocks matters for portfolio management. It used to be that you could consider blue-chip US stocks to be a medium-risk kind of an investment, or at the right price, a low-risk one. But with valuations at these levels, that doesn't make any sense. Risk, says Bennett, is always a moving target and today those same stocks must be considered "speculative".
The same goes for most of the bond market. It isn't a great environment for anyone who has the hunt for value as a core part of their strategy. It also isn't great for anyone who likes to buy and hold for the long term, as Buffett does. Clever traders will always do better in times of expensive volatility.
Still, there's always something out there. Those looking for opportunities could try China, or perhaps India, which isn't particularly cheap but does seem to be jammed with interesting opportunity.
Otherwise, Bennett has been looking in Europe, where the economy is getting up off the floor and where corporate profits are being revised up not down. He has bought a fund tracking the Italian market, which in Cape terms is currently under a third of the price of the American market.
-
Rightmove: property asking prices hit record highNews Rising demand for top of the ladder home is boosting asking prices, Rightmove research shows. Is now a good time to sell a property?
-
FTSE 100 hits record highs – why is it rising and will we see more gains?Advice UK equities have been described as unloved for a long time but as the FTSE 100 hits new highs, we explain if now is the time to buy British.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Why we need to get a grip on our governmentEditor's letter Our government is trying to do too much, enacting policies that are destructive to the private sector. It needs to drop the the feel-good nonsense and create policies that lead to long-term wealth, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
