Not long now. In a mere eight weeks, George Osborne's pension freedoms will become reality: 320,000-odd people per year will have a new list of choices about how they use their pension. Anyone over 55 will be able to take as much money as they like whenever they want from their pot, subject to paying their marginal rate of income tax on the cash.
The reaction to this has been hugely positive and the financial industry is happily gearing up for a world in which retirees with large lump sums are looking for products to buy. Meanwhile, the government expects the cash-in option to be so popular that by 2018/2019 it will be collecting an extra £1.2bn from people withdrawing lump sums. But here's a thought: given what a good deal pensions now are, might it not be better to put more money into them rather than totake money out?
Late last year George Osborne announced the abolition of the so-called 'death tax' on pensions. For an explanation of what that is, watch this video, but the effect is that all assets held inside a pension fund can be passed on to heirs regardless of whether the original pensioner dies before or after the age of 75, and whether or not any money has already been withdrawn. Heirs can take out the money as and when they like, paying income tax at their own marginal rate.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
This makes the new regime "dramatically different" from the old, says George Bull at accountants Baker Tilly. Given that it makes a pension the only asset entirely free from inheritance tax, it creates a huge incentive to leave as much money as possible inside a pension scheme. It is surely "such a good deal" that it should encourage people who have doubts to embark enthusiastically on pensions auto-enrolment.
It might even be worth switching Isas into pensions to take advantage of the pensions inheritability. If your estate is large enough that cash inside your Isas will end up subject to inheritance tax, it should be possible to shift the cash into a self-invested personal pension and remove it from the net. (This may need to be done in stages, depending on annual pension contributions limits.)That said, this does come with risks.
The pensions regime is now so generous that it's hard to imagine it will stay as it is. A Labour government may well remove inheritability. And if too many people spend their cash on cars and holidays,we may soon find a compulsory annuities system reintroduced. Nothing reliant on the whims of government comes withreal guarantees.
Merryn Somerset Webb started her career in Tokyo at public broadcaster NHK before becoming a Japanese equity broker at what was then Warburgs. She went on to work at SBC and UBS without moving from her desk in Kamiyacho (it was the age of mergers).
After five years in Japan she returned to work in the UK at Paribas. This soon became BNP Paribas. Again, no desk move was required. On leaving the City, Merryn helped The Week magazine with its City pages before becoming the launch editor of MoneyWeek in 2000 and taking on columns first in the Sunday Times and then in 2009 in the Financial Times
Twenty years on, MoneyWeek is the best-selling financial magazine in the UK. Merryn was its Editor in Chief until 2022. She is now a senior columnist at Bloomberg and host of the Merryn Talks Money podcast - but still writes for Moneyweek monthly.
Merryn is also is a non executive director of two investment trusts – BlackRock Throgmorton, and the Murray Income Investment Trust.
Should your business invest in a VoIP phone service?
Here's what you need to know about VOIP (voice over IP) services before landlines go digital in 2025.
By David Prosser Published
M&S is back in fashion: but how long can this success last?
M&S has exceeded expectations in the past few years, but can it keep up the momentum?
By Rupert Hargreaves Published