Do you pay income tax in the UK? That makes you one of 24 million people set to receive a letter with a pie chart showing you where your tax goes. From this you will learn, for example, that some 25% of what you pay is spent on what the government calls welfare'.
All this has caused some upset. The welfare numbers, says the TUC, are "party-political propaganda masquerading as neutral information". They take issue with the definition.
The TUC doesn't like public-sector pensions classified as welfare', and they aren't sure that payments for long-term care for the elderly should be either, or even benefit payments to those in work. For them, welfare means just benefits paid to those of working age who are not in work.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Other organisations have a different take: they think welfare should be split on the pie chart to show how much is paid to older people (17% of your income tax); to the unemployed and those on low incomes (6%); to the sick and disabled (5%); and to families with children (5%).
This is interesting the kind of definitional row I could happily spend hours on. But fretting over classifications in this way rather misses the really critical points.
The first is just how much tax we all pay. Make £50,000 and your income tax/national insurance bill will come to around £13,800. But that's just the start. Add in VAT, stamp duty, capital gains tax, inheritance tax, passenger duty and the like and the take from the working population is shockingly high.
The second is that the state does an awful lot of things. The pie chart you will get has 15 categories. Each can be broken down into many hundreds more. That begs the question we just don't ask often enough: what is government for?
For the answer, says an editorial in The Times this week, we must look to Canada. Back in 1994, Canada's government put in place a "programme review". The idea was to look at every single programme and ask if it served the public interest. If the answer was no', it was to be cut.
If it was yes', the question changed to whether it was necessary for the state itself to provide the service, or if it should be transferred to the private or voluntary sector. This worked. Within three years, the deficit had fallen from 9% of GDP to zero. By 1999, public debt was down by a third. Spending had fallen 20%. This is the kind of thinking we need in the UK.
We (like the US) still haven't faced up to the fact that we can't afford to keep state spending at this level. We need a plan for change. Yet none of our politicians have told us what they really think government is for or, crucially, what it is not for.
With that in mind I am reading a book by US libertarian Matt Kibbe. He focuses on the latter. His book title? "Don't hurt people and don't take their stuff." It is as good a place to start as any. Over to you, Dave.
-
Water companies blocked from using customer money to pay “undeserved” bonusesThe regulator has blocked three water companies from using billpayer money to pay £1.5 million in exec bonuses
-
Will the Bitcoin price hit $100,000?With Bitcoin prices trading just below $100,000, we explore whether the cryptocurrency can hit the milestone.
-
Inflation may be slipping but there is still plenty of misery aheadEditor's letter Inflation may be a little lower than last month as the prices of petrol and diesel fall back, but it remains structural and long-term, says Merryn Somerset Webb. And there are no painless solutions.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
The public may have reached its limit for tax risesEditor's letter The UK tax burden is now at a 70-year high. And, while there may be some reason to hold off on cuts right now, taxes are too high because the state tries to do too much. Perhaps it should do less, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
