This week the name of the fare-dodging fund manager was unveiled. Jonathan Burrows skipped paying his train fare from Kent to London for five years, said the Daily Mail, and then tried to avoid anyone finding out by paying out £43,000 in back fares. That didn't work.
The police and the Financial Conduct Authority investigated and Burrows has now resigned from his smart job at BlackRock. This is a fascinating story for all sorts of reasons, but for me, the most interesting bit is how Burrows held down his job for as long as he did.
Why? Because he has the kind of attitude to risk that you really don't want the person looking after your money to have the one that considers it reasonable to take massive reputational and financial risks for relatively small gains (or thrills). I wonder why no one at BlackRock noticed earlier.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Last week also saw the launch of areport from ResPublica (VirtuousBanking: Placing ethos and purpose at the heart of finance), which suggested that bankers should be made to take an oath to "fulfil their proper moral and economic purpose", as is now the case in the Netherlands.
They'd promise to do their "utmost to behave in a manner that prioritises the needs of customers", to "confront profligacy and impropriety" wherever they encounter it; and to note that "the conduct of bankers can have dramatic consequences for society".
Look north and you will see that this isn't a new idea for the financial industry: Edinburgh-based managers First State Investments already have what they call a Hippocratic oath for asset managers.
In light of the Burrows story, some of the clauses of this oath are rather interesting. "I will strive to achieve through hard work, sober analysis and sound judgement the best risk-adjusted returns possible for my clients." And "I will not forget in my search for returns that the primary risk faced by my clients is losing their capital".
At first glance, the idea of suggesting an oath for bankers or for fund managers seems mildly ridiculous. But it might be a more valuable process than first glance suggests.
How many people go into banking understanding that "the conduct of bankers can have dramatic consequences for society"? And how many trainee fund managers really understand the moral responsibility that comes with having the financial hopes and dreams of millions in their hands? I can tell you for certain that the answer among the young fund managers I knew when I was a young broker was none.
Oaths aren't the answer to every problem, and nor will they automatically restore trust in our dismal financial system. But taken every year in public they might act as a nice reminder to all our brokers, bankers, and managers that working in finance is about more than bonuses.
-
Water companies blocked from using customer money to pay “undeserved” bonusesThe regulator has blocked three water companies from using billpayer money to pay £1.5 million in exec bonuses
-
Will the Bitcoin price hit $100,000?With Bitcoin prices trading just below $100,000, we explore whether the cryptocurrency can hit the milestone.
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holidayEditor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governanceEditor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
Don't be scared by economic forecastingEditor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s doorEditor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation worksEditor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
-
Car hire and the strangeness of the post-pandemic economyEditor's letter A global shortage of hire cars and unusually high hotel occupancy rates sum up the post-pandemic global economy in a nutshell, says Merryn Somerset Webb, with enhanced demand meeting restricted supply.
-
Why we need to get a grip on our governmentEditor's letter Our government is trying to do too much, enacting policies that are destructive to the private sector. It needs to drop the the feel-good nonsense and create policies that lead to long-term wealth, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
