"The bank charges battle at the High Court could be derailed", says Alan O'Sullivan on Thisismoney.co.uk. That would spell bad news for "the entire consumer campaign to win back between £20bn-30bn in unfair bank charges". So what's going on? In April this year "bank charges reclaiming history was made", says Martin Lewis on Moneysavingexpert.com.
That's because a High Court judge ruled, in effect, that seven UK banks (Abbey, Barclays, Clydesdale, HBOS, HSBC, LloydsTSB and RBS) currently take what the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) estimates is up to £2.5bn from their customers in unfair unauthorised overdraft charges every year. As a result, says The Guardian's Jon Robins, the OFT was allowed to decide what should be classified as unfair charges under a piece of legislation with the racy title, 'the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulation 1999'.
This is the decision that the banks are now appealing. The ante has been upped, as the case is now being handled by the Court of Appeal with a ruling "expected in January". But there's a twist. While the existing ruling applies to current overdraft charges, a final decision has yet to be made by the High Court as to whether the OFT has the power to assess historic charges too. That matters, because under the UK Statute of Limitations you can make a claim for up to six years' worth of charges in England and Wales and five in Scotland. Meanwhile, the Financial Services Authority has enraged many consumers by granting a waiver to the banks that effectively puts existing claims on hold until the Court of Appeal makes its next decision.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
So far, so frustrating but what should you do if you think you may have been hit with excessive fees? First off, says Lewis, "get in the queue". The longer you wait, the further down the line you will be, and what's more, the six-year limitation kicks in from the date you submit a claim. Sure, the FSA claims to have put a 'time bar' in place that stopped the six-year clock ticking as of July 2007, but its legal status is still not clear. So claim back as far as possible all the way back to July 2001 if you have evidence of being overcharged and do it soon. And, adds Robins, don't be fooled into using a "claims management company" you can prepare the letter to go to your bank yourself, just see Moneymadeclear.fsa.gov.uk for guidance. Then all you can do, for now, is wait.
-
-
Act now: First Direct’s £175 switching bonus ending soon
First Direct has launched a £12,500 prize draw on top of its £175 cash bonus - but they both finish soon, so you’ll need to be quick
-
Credit card providers slash 0% balance transfer deals
Customers face a double whammy of rising interest rates and shorter 0% balance transfer periods. We look at what’s going on in the credit card market and why you’ll need to act fast to get the top 0% balance transfer deal
