I went on BBC Money Box last weekend to talk about emerging markets. Jim O'Neill, the ex-Goldman guru who came up with the idea that everyone must invest in the Brics (Brazil, Russia, India and China), has given us a new acronym summing up where he thinks we should put our money now Mint (Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey).
Did I think, asked our BBC host, that this would be a good idea? My answer? Not particularly. Back in the days when everyone went on endlessly about the Brics, Albert Edwards of Socit Gnrale rebranded the idea as Bloody Ridiculous Investment Concept. He isn't too impressed by Mint either to him it is just More Irritating New Terminology.
The key point is that there is rarely a link between economic growth and stock-market returns. Quite the opposite. Academics Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton have done endless research on this.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
One study of 105 years of markets showed that those based in the countries with the lowest GDP growth beat those with the highest by, on average, three percentage points a year.
Look at a chart of stock-market returns and real GDP across the world from 1900 to 2002 and it is the lower-growth countries that have had the best returns (think Britain, America, Australia and Sweden).
Finally, look to China. Its real GDP growth has been far faster than America's for the last 20 years (10% against just 2.6%), but has provided almost nothing in terms of equity market returns: you'd have made 9.2% a year in America and a mere 0.4% in China. Why? Because in fast-growing economies, growth itself tends to take precedence over everything else.
If you are focused on gaining market share or on building infrastructure, you don't tend to make much in the way of profits. At the same time, emerging stock markets are often dominated by state-owned firms (governments often have non-profit objectives), and their regulators aren't as particular about property and shareholder rights as they might be.
All this tells us that we shouldn't buy emerging-market stocks unless these factors are priced in. You shouldn't buy anything unless it is cheap. But you certainly shouldn't buy emerging-market equities unless they are very cheap indeed.
The good news is that some of the Brics are getting there. Russia is on a forward price-to-earnings ratio of only four times. China is under eight. Both are also displaying slower growth than they were. That combination very often results in good returns. So if you want to be in emerging markets, skip the Mints and buy the last of the Brics.
If you want to argue about this or any of the other things we write about while contributing to a good cause, visit www.christies.com/onlineonly, where you can bid for a fabulous dinner with me and a group of guests.
-
FTSE 100 hits record highs – why is it rising and will we see more gains?Advice UK equities have been described as unloved for a long time but as the FTSE 100 hits new highs, we explain if now is the time to buy British.
-
How to invest in copperIt may be time to invest in copper as the red metal appears poised for a big jump. Dominic Frisby looks at what should investors should buy
