Carney’s blind bet
The Bank of England governor placed his bets on the one number nobody can be sure of, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
Not many people grasp just how bad the UK's recession has been. It hasn't felt quite as bad as it should, thanks to the ultra-low interest rates that have kept the wolves from many doors, and a bout of inflation that temporarily disguised falling real wages.
But it is worth remembering that the Great Depression ran for 42 months, while we have been mired in our own misery for 60 months.
The good news, as we said a few months ago, is that when you have a very nasty economic slump, you tend to get a fabulous rebound.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
When Bank of England governor Mark Carney introduced the idea of forward guidance' back in August, he said he would start looking at raising interest rates when unemployment hit 7%, which he expected to happen in 2016.
We weren't convinced: we said we expected unemployment to fall and hence rates to rise rather faster than the Bank did.
So far that's been a good call. Unemployment in the UK is now down to 7.6% of the economically active population or just 7.1% if you look at the one-month rather than the rolling three-month numbers. Carney now thinks we will hit 7% 18 months earlier than he had previously thought.
But while, on the face of it, this might suggest you should plan for the first rate rise (fix that mortgage!), remember that none of this is set in stone. That's largely because we don't really understand the UK unemployment numbers.
Unemployment rose post-crisis but by nowhere near as much as the Bank expected. But output and productivity (a measure of how efficient the work force is) fell rather more than expected.
We also know that huge numbers of people two million are underemployed. They are in jobs, but aren't doing the hours they want to do. So you could say that what really matters is not employment itself, but two other numbers under-employment and productivity.
If both improve, then unemployment can only come down slowly if the staff already on your payroll work better and for longer, you don't need to hire to raise output. If they don't, employment will rise as demand does.
So Carney has made more of a bet on productivity than anything else. And if there is one number in the UK economy no one can quite get to grips with, it is productivity. Why did it fall? What might make it go up? We all have ideas, some more polite than others. But no one really knows.
We said from the start that forward guidance seemed a pretty dim-witted policy. Based as it is on a number no one understands, we still think it is. It tells us nothing about when rates will actually rise it may be 2014, but if it is, the bare unemployment numbers won't be the trigger.
I have met Mr Carney since I last wrote about forward guidance. He seemed nice. But we instantly found something to disagree on (the impact of changes to executive compensation on economic growth, in this case). That at least is, I think, a trend we can be sure will continue.
Sign up to Money Morning
Our team, led by award winning editors, is dedicated to delivering you the top news, analysis, and guides to help you manage your money, grow your investments and build wealth.
Merryn Somerset Webb started her career in Tokyo at public broadcaster NHK before becoming a Japanese equity broker at what was then Warburgs. She went on to work at SBC and UBS without moving from her desk in Kamiyacho (it was the age of mergers).
After five years in Japan she returned to work in the UK at Paribas. This soon became BNP Paribas. Again, no desk move was required. On leaving the City, Merryn helped The Week magazine with its City pages before becoming the launch editor of MoneyWeek in 2000 and taking on columns first in the Sunday Times and then in 2009 in the Financial Times
Twenty years on, MoneyWeek is the best-selling financial magazine in the UK. Merryn was its Editor in Chief until 2022. She is now a senior columnist at Bloomberg and host of the Merryn Talks Money podcast - but still writes for Moneyweek monthly.
Merryn is also is a non executive director of two investment trusts – BlackRock Throgmorton, and the Murray Income Investment Trust.
-
Energy bills to rise by 1.2% in January 2025
Energy bills are set to rise 1.2% in the New Year when the latest energy price cap comes into play, Ofgem has confirmed
By Dan McEvoy Published
-
Should you invest in Trainline?
Ticket seller Trainline offers a useful service – and good prospects for investors
By Dr Matthew Partridge Published
-
Inflation may be slipping but there is still plenty of misery ahead
Editor's letter Inflation may be a little lower than last month as the prices of petrol and diesel fall back, but it remains structural and long-term, says Merryn Somerset Webb. And there are no painless solutions.
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
Beat the cost of living crisis – go on holiday
Editor's letter As inflation rages, energy bills soar and the pound tanks, what’s a good way to save money this winter? Go on holiday, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published
-
How capitalism has been undermined by poor governance
Editor's letter Capitalism’s “ruthless efficiency” has been undermined by poor governance, a lack of competition and central banks’ over-enthusiastic money printing, says Andrew Van Sickle.
By Andrew Van Sickle Published
-
Don't be scared by economic forecasting
Editor's letter The Bank of England warned last week the UK will tip into recession this year. But predictions about stockmarkets, earnings or macroeconomic trends can be safely ignored, says Andrew Van Sickle.
By Andrew Van Sickle Published
-
The biggest change in the last 17 years – the death of the “Greenspan put”
Editor's letter Since I joined MoneyWeek 17 years ago, says John Stepek, we’ve seen a global financial crisis, a eurozone sovereign debt crisis , several Chinese growth scares, a global pandemic, and a land war in Europe. But the biggest change is the death of the “Greenspan put”.
By John Stepek Published
-
The wolf returns to the eurozone’s door
Editor's letter The eurozone’s intrinsic flaws have been exposed again as investors’ fears about Italy’s ability to pay its debt sends bond yields soaring.
By Andrew Van Sickle Published
-
Things won't just return to normal – that's not how inflation works
Editor's letter You might think that, if inflation is indeed “transitory”, we just need to wait and everything will return to “normal”. But this is a grave misunderstanding of how inflation works, says John Stepek.
By John Stepek Published
-
The public may have reached its limit for tax rises
Editor's letter The UK tax burden is now at a 70-year high. And, while there may be some reason to hold off on cuts right now, taxes are too high because the state tries to do too much. Perhaps it should do less, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
By Merryn Somerset Webb Published