Admirably unreasonable

You might think you've read enough about Margaret Thatcher by now. But I'm afraid that if you are going to get to the end of this week's magazine, you are going to read more.We've looked at her rise to power and at some of the responses to her legacy,and we've looked at how her work really affected the UK economy then and now.

Skim those, and you will see why most of us at MoneyWeek admired her greatly. She was a fabulous leader, a firm feminist, an intelligent policy maker and, as prime minister, a person who was clearly dedicated to improving the lot of as many Britons as she could.

She didn't get everything right, of course (although her foresight on the problems inherent in the euro, among other things, was impressive) and the financial help she got from North Sea oil revenues is rarely fully recognised by her idolisers. But what she did do was to recognise the real problems facing Britain; to recognise the failure of the policies that had come before her tenure; and to force through change.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Sign up

The best tribute to that core characteristic I've seen yet comes from one-time Tory party moderniser Steve Hilton in The Spectator. She was, he says "thrillingly anti-establishment". She had all the virtues we most value today: "innovation, energy, daring". She was determined "to shake things up, unleash competition, challenge and confront vested interests". All that made her the "ultimate political disrupter".

Many people have only ever seen Thatcher as a deeply unreasonable woman. But focus-group-style compromise doesn't always get you what you need in a time of crisis (and no one really denies that Thatcher took over a country in crisis). As Hilton says, if you want to be transformative, "being reasonable doesn't get you very far. In government, it is unreasonableness that improves people's lives."

Doubters might note that on Thatcher's watch, real wages rose for every UK income group, and median wages rose faster than in either Labour's second or third terms (Institute of Fiscal Studies/Channel 4). Just think how thrilled we'd all be if someone as unreasonable as Thatcher turned up today and made that happen again.

Now there seems to be a new disrupter emerging in Japan. Bank of Japan chief Haruhiko Kuroda (now known as 'Helicopter Haruhiko') has unleashed an extraordinary campaign of money printing, aiming to reverse 20 years' worth of deflation and near-deflation. Bill Bonner says it is "insane lunacy". Tim Price says it is akin to a "holy war". Hedge fund manager Kyle Bass says it marks the start of a run-up to hyperinflation. And James Fergusson says it's a fabulous opportunity.

We are mostly with James (obviously), but either way, the yen is down 20% or so in trade-weighted terms since it became clear that Kuroda had a plan, and the stock market is up around 40%. Nothing for MoneyWeek readers to complain about there.