Electronics components supplier Premier Farnell said profit in the third quarter fell amid challenging market conditions as it executes cost cuts in the final quarter which are expected to produce annual savings of 4m pounds.
Pre-tax profit for three months ended October 28th fell to £17.3m compared with £19.4m the same time a year ago. Revenue for the period slipped to £233.5m from £241.8m before
Adjusted pre-tax profit at the FTSE 250 firm fell to £17.3m from £21.1m while adjusted earnings per share fell to 3.4p compared to 4.2p previously.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Commenting on the results, Chief Executive Laurence Bain said: "After seeing a slightly positive start to the quarter in August, market conditions remained volatile in September and October and we saw year on year sales declines in those months. As a result, our third quarter sales declined 1.6%."
The group, which is moving focus towards markets in Taiwan, Thailand and South Korea as UK and Europe sales dwindle said: "With global conditions continuing to be uncertain, and with very limited forward order visibility, we have executed cost actions in the fourth quarter which will deliver annualised savings of £4m."
Premier Farnell said further cost actions would be taken if momentum does not improve.
CJ
-
Rents rise at slowest pace for four years – is buy-to-let still worth it?Slowing rental growth and higher property taxes are creating a headache for landlords. Does buy-to-let still offer a good yield?
-
Should you bag a bargain with a half-price investment trust?Twenty-six investment trusts look cheap by historic standards, with some trading at a discount of more than 50%. Are they a bargain or value trap?
