I’ve never tipped a gold miner – until now

A protest against mining in Lima, Peru © Getty images
Protesters in Peru have felt betrayed

For centuries, tales of Peruvian gold have enticed European investors. In the 16th century, reports of the wealth in the then Inca Empire lured Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro to what is now modern-day Peru.

His first two attempts failed, but eventually the persistent Pizarro managed to establish a toehold in the country. Like modern-day international investors, Pizarro was keen to profit from the country’s natural resources – albeit through slightly different means.

First, he captured the Inca emperor, Atahualpa, and demanded a roomful of gold as a ransom. Then, once he had received the gold, he killed the emperor anyway – the first of many treacherous deals that would make local people wary of foreigners that come to exploit the country’s natural resources.

In the centuries following Pizarro’s arrival, Europeans would develop different ways to exploit Peru’s gold. When the indigenous mineworkers were almost wiped out by European diseases, the Spanish brought in slaves from Africa and following that, from China.

In the 19th century, slavery was abolished in Peru, yet working conditions and pay meant that life for many miners was not far off it.

In short, the post-Inca history of Peruvian mining is one of exploitation. A story where the foreigners, their descendents or international companies pushed the unwilling local population to unlock the country’s incredible mineral reserves.

Nowadays, a lot of that has changed. Working conditions and pay in legal mines are good, making it a sought-after job. Yet, the history of opposition between international bosses and local workers and communities remains.

After all, Peru’s mining projects take place in the poorest, most remote parts of the country; places where the community’s memory of the 500-years of oppression haven’t yet been replaced by the fruits of the country’s two-decade-old economic boom.

Local communities are sick of broken promises

Peru is home to 4% of the planet’s gold reserves. But right now, Peruvian mining is riven by protests, with billions of dollars worth of projects being delayed or cancelled.

As I mentioned the other week, the reasons for these protests are complex. Sometimes they are because of genuine environmental concerns. Sometimes they are being propelled by the shadowy forces of illegal miners, drug lords and contraband smugglers.

But sometimes they are because the mining company has not got the approval of the local community. It’s that last factor that I want to talk about today. Because I’ve found a London-listed miner whose good relations with the local community should help it develop a transformative new project.

Getting on with the local community can make the difference between a successful project and a failed one. Peru’s president Ollanta Humala came to power on the promise that he would share the spoils of the country’s economic boom with its rural majority. So far that hasn’t happened.

Lots of complicating factors, such as inefficient or corrupt local authorities, have impeded Humala’s attempts to boost investment in remote areas. As a result the rural communities feel betrayed and are determined to stop projects that they feel are violating their rights.

At times the protests, which involve thousands of people, have got so bad that Humala has declared martial law to take the extraordinary measures needed to quell them.


the-new-world-250x45

If you've enjoyed what you've read so far, I've got something you'll definitely be interested in.

'The New World' is MoneyWeek's FREE globally-focused weekly email, bringing you the most exciting investment stories from Asia and Latin America.

Sign up here FREE to The New World email


The one miner that Peruvians trust

But mining projects in Peru don’t have to end that way. In fact, last week I interviewed the country manager and founding partner of a London-listed Peruvian miner who reckons that his firm has found a formula to avoid these types of conflicts.

Diego Benavides founded Minera IRL (Aim: MIRL) in 2000. Together with his Australian partner, Courtney Chamberlain, they sorted through a range of projects before securing exploration rights to a “small, but exciting” 140,000-ounce gold deposit high in the Peruvian Andes.

By 2007, they had a bankable feasibility study and tapped British capital by listing it on Aim. In the last decade, they’ve taken the mine from planning to production and churned out hundreds of thousands of ounces of gold.

Buoyed by their success, the pair led the firm on an ambitious expansion plan. They spent $11m on a fellow Aim-listed gold miner, which gave them the rights to a 360,000-ounce gold deposit in Argentina and a further 260,000 hectares of exploration rights. They also – and this is the bit that interests me – bought the rights to a one million-ounce gold deposit in the south of Peru.

All of this expansion, coupled with a slide in gold prices in the last year, seems to have worried investors with Minera’s share price tanking by around 90% since its April 2011 peak. But I think that could be about to change.

The key to the transformation will be the Ollachea project in Peru. If everything goes to plan, the company is due to get financing and construction permits this summer and then produce its first gold in 2016.

Why am I optimistic? Well, for starters, the project looks likely to get financing. A lot of gold investors have been put off by the yellow metal’s slide, but with it currently trading at $1,250 an ounce, Minera’s estimated production cost of less than $600 per ounce looks pretty safe.

I also fancy construction to go without a hitch. After all, this same management team have a good track record. But the real reason for my optimism is the community relations.

As I’ve said before, I’m normally pretty sceptical about companies’ corporate social responsibility blurb. But we’ve seen that in Peru it can make all the difference. And after having a long chat with Diego Benavides, I am pretty convinced that Minera’s flagship project shouldn’t have too many problems.

Minera’s solution: Make the locals shareholders

When the company bought the exploration rights to the area from Rio Tinto, it didn’t just plough straight into work. Instead, it spent about 15 months talking with the Ollachea community, to win their consent too.

Permission was eventually given after Minera agreed to launch all sorts of health and education programmes. Then, once a feasibility study had confirmed that there was a giant mining project to be had, Minera approached the community to negotiate another contract.

This 30-year contract had another slew of programmes, but the truly radical part was that it gave the community a 5% shareholding in the subsidiary that will operate the project. The only catch was that the community only gets its shareholding once the mine starts production.

“Now they can’t wait for us to begin work soon enough”, enthuses Diego Benavides. “While other communities are trying to stop projects, this community wants us to go even quicker.”

In fact, he continues, the only ones not happy with the deal were the other mining companies. “Some of them were angry. They felt that by doing this, I was undermining them in future negotiations with communities.”

Of course, buying shares in any miner that’s about to launch its flagship project is always risky. And as Minera’s own share chart proves – investors can be an unforgiving bunch if they think a company is not performing. But to make the really big gains, you have to take risks.

In more than four years at MoneyWeek, I’ve never tipped a gold miner. But I think that Minera IRL’s sound understanding of the complexities of the Peruvian mining scene make it a great way to get exposure to the country’s legendary riches.

This article is taken from The New World, MoneyWeek's FREE regular email of investment ideas and news from Asia and Latin America. Sign up to The New World here.

• Stay up to date with MoneyWeek: Follow us on TwitterFacebook and Google+

2 Responses

  1. 02/06/2014, Oscar Foxtrot wrote

    Thanks James – an interesting tip. I bought in this afternoon for a modest sum.

  2. 02/06/2014, Firef1y wrote

    I have held a quantity of these (painfully) for some time believing it to be a good company – one of the few goldies that generally achieves and often exceeds what it forecasts, to date anyway, and especially in relation to Corihuarmi. It was caught by the general downturn in prec-met miner sentiment and more particularly by its involvement in Argentina – which may yet come right with production from a partially hived off subsidiary at Don Nicolas and the possibility of a deal at Escondido/Las Calandrias. (See also Mariana Resources about Las Calandrias.) However, Ollachea is its flag-ship project. The tunnel drive to access the main ore body there was accomplished under budget in both time and cost and the necessary capital financing deal with McQuarie for the complete mine construction and equipment is rumoured to be imminent.
    I am of course biassed, but I find it very encouraging that MW should pick this company at this time and I believe your vibes are very probablyaccurate.

Comment on this article

MoneyWeek magazine

Latest issue:

Magazine cover
Hard cash

What's next for gold and silver?

The UK's best-selling financial magazine. Take a FREE trial today.
Claim 4 FREE Issues
Shale gas 'fracking' promises to transform Britain's energy market. Find out what it is, what it means, and how to invest.

More from MoneyWeek

FREE REPORT:
What you should really do with your money (2014 Edition)


How to buy and sell penny shares

A beginner's guide to investing in gold

How to invest in British fracking