Buy farms, not flats

Are property taxes too low or too high? A tweet from The Daily Mail’s Becky Barrow reminded me this week to check just how today’s taxes fare against those in the pre-council tax days.

Becky notes stamp duty hasn’t “always been a rip off”. In 1992, it was charged at a mere 1% on all houses sold for more than £30,000. But the thing about taxes in the UK is that there is usually a good amount of give and take.

The UK’s tax take is always knocking around between 33% and 36% of GDP. That’s rather lower than public spending (which is a shame…), but no government has managed to push it any higher, or shown much inclination to allow it to go lower.

So, one way or another, the rise in stamp duty is likely to have been matched by a fall in another property tax.

Which one? It’s pretty much what we used to call rates (the modern equivalent is council tax). Rates, abolished in 1990 after the dismal poll tax experiment, were based on the imputed rent for any given house.

They were both relatively high and much hated: as far back as 1907, British historian George Trevelyan complained that “the rates are one of the highest and the worst taxes under which Englishmen… have ever groaned”. Was it really that bad?

Let’s look at one small London house to see. In 1985, 2 Gaspar Mews in South Kensington sold for £180,000. Its sale particulars show that the annual rates payment at the time was £1,139 – 0.63% of its market price. Inflation-adjust £1,139 and you get £2,925.64 today.

Now guess what you would pay in council tax on 2 Gaspar Mews today. It is £1,786. A mere 60% of what the absolute level of tax used to be. Now look at the relative tax rates. The house is worth around £1.6m now.

So, its annual property tax comes in at not 0.63% of its market price, but just over 0.1%. Relative to the value of the house, the annual levy has collapsed (as for that matter has the ability of councils to collect local revenues).

Look at it like that, and suddenly paying 5% in stamp duty when you buy a South Kensington mews house doesn’t seem so big a deal. The change might also help us make sense of the rise in house prices in the UK since 1990.

We tend to think that the biggest thing affecting house prices is the cost (and availability) of credit. But that’s largely because, today, that is the main cost of owning a house.

However, the collapse in annual property taxes must surely have played a part here too over the past 25 years: if the cost of owning an asset falls substantially, then it should be no surprise that the market price of that asset rises.

It works the other way too, of course, something London buyers might like to bear in mind as the rhetoric around mansion taxes steps up. Perhaps those with spare cash should be buying farms instead of flats?

  • GreenGray

    On reading the print edition earlier, I note that the 6.3% referred to in the printed version has become the more correct 0.63%, but it also removed part of the rationale in the article. Using a factor of 60 makes the article sensible, using a factor of 6 makes it less so.

66% off newsstand price

12 issues (and much more) for just £12

That’s right. We’ll give you 12 issues of MoneyWeek magazine, complete access to our exclusive web articles, our latest wealth building reports and videos as well as our subscriber-only email… for just £12.

That’s just £1 per week for Britain’s best-selling financial magazine.

Click here to take advantage of our offer

Britain is leaving the European Union. Donald Trump is reducing America’s role in global markets. Both will have profound consequences for you as an investor.

MoneyWeek analyses the critical issues facing British investors on a weekly basis. And, unlike other publications, we provide you with the solutions to help you turn a situation to your financial advantage.

Take up our offer today, and we’ll send you three of our most important investment reports:

All three of these reports are yours when you take up our 12 issues for £12 offer today.

MoneyWeek has been advising private British investors on what to do with their money since 2000. Our calls over that period have enabled our readers to both make and save a great deal of money – hence our position as the UK’s most-trusted investment publication.

Click here to subscribe for just £12