New pension incentives? Don't bother with the young – help the 50-somethings first

Young people have better things to do with their money then save for a pension, says Merryn Somerset Webb. The government should help those who really need it.

161012-pensions

All pension tax reliefs are under review all the time, that's pretty clear. And for a government in fiscal distress, it makes sense.

Pension tax relief is expensive in the short term. However, as the state also knows, having a population with horribly inadequate pension savings is rather more expensive in the longer term. So all reforms must encourage people to save from a young age, and to keep saving.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Become a smarter, better informed investor with MoneyWeek.

Enter Hargreaves Lansdown, which seems to have been working with the Treasury on a list of proposals to help make this happen.

Some are good (a flat £20,000 annual allowance regardless of income, for example). I'll come back to these another time, but the most eye catching one is not good at all. It is to change the government top-up system so that it is no longer linked to income (ie you get your tax back on pension contributions regardless of the rate you pay) but to age.

Advertisement
Advertisement - Article continues below

This, says Hargreaves Lansdown, would be achieved by "a government top up of 100 minus an individual's age: a 25 year old would receive a top up of £75 for every £100 they invest; a 50 year old would receive a top up of £50 for every £100 they invest."

This sounds marvellous. It would motivate the young to save. It would help everyone make more use of the miracle of compounding. It would put some very long-term money into the stockmarket and it would "correct some of the intergenerational imbalances that have developed in society." But it isn't.

The key point here is that the young don't tend to save much. They never have (this isn't new). That's partly because they don't want to (65 is impossible to see when you are 25 however you are incentivised to see it). But it is mainly because they can't afford to: they have traveling to do, rent to pay, houses to think about and children to bring up.

The truth is that most people can only really start to save in their 40s and only do so in reasonable volume in their 50s. So, giving these huge top ups to those in their 20s (mainly with taxes paid by those in their 50s) is nuts. It will benefit the average 20-something in no way at all, while giving a whopper of a boost to the few 20-somethings who either inherit cash early or have parents who can take advantage of the insanely generous tax incentives it would create on their behalf. No shift to greater equality likely there.

At the same time, it would discriminate against the people who really need help and fast: those without defined-benefit pensions now hitting their late 40s and 50s and desperately trying to play pension catch-up. These are the people we should be figuring out how to help.

The time to give people a real incentive to save is surely when they can actually afford to do so. Help the people who both want to play catch up and actually can play catch up. Anything else is just pointless posturing.

Advertisement

Recommended

Visit/513684/companies-cut-back-on-their-pensions-bills
Personal finance

Companies cut back on their pensions bills

Britvic is the latest firm hoping a cheaper inflation index will cut pension costs. David Prosser reports.
28 Aug 2019
Visit/509683/good-news-for-savers
Pensions

Good news for pensions savers from HMRC

HMRC has withdrawn its appeal over breaches of the pensions lifetime allowance.
28 Jun 2019
Visit/personal-finance/pensions/601009/tinkering-with-the-pensions-tapering-system
Pensions

Tinkering with the pensions tapering system

The problems caused by the annual pension contribution allowance have been partially addressed, says David Prosser.
24 Mar 2020
Visit/node/601003
Pensions

Bad news on pensions buried in the Budget

Changing the way pensions are increased in line with inflation could cost the average pension scheme member as much as £12,000.
18 Mar 2020

Most Popular

Visit/investments/property/601065/what-does-the-coronavirus-crisis-mean-for-uk-house-prices
Property

What does the coronavirus crisis mean for UK house prices?

With the whole country in lockdown, the UK property market is closed for business. John Stepek looks at what that means for UK house prices, housebuil…
27 Mar 2020
Visit/economy/uk-economy/601063/the-uks-bailout-of-the-self-employed-comes-with-a-hidden-catch
UK Economy

The UK’s bailout of the self employed comes with a hidden catch

The chancellor’s £6.5bn bailout of the self employed is welcome. But it has hidden benefits for the taxman, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
27 Mar 2020
Visit/personal-finance/mortgages/601045/coronavirus-what-it-means-for-your-mortgage-or-your-rent
Mortgages

Coronavirus: what it means for your mortgage or your rent

Ruth Jackson-Kirby looks at all the key questions for owners, renters and landlords affected by the coronavirus crisis.
29 Mar 2020
Visit/economy/uk-economy/601055/debt-jubilee-will-our-debts-be-written-off
UK Economy

Debt jubilee: will our debts be written off?

The idea of a "debt jubilee" – general society-wide cancellation of debt – goes back to Biblical times. Could it happen again? And would it really do …
28 Mar 2020