Ask anyone who does anything related to pensions these days about pensions tax relief and they will all tell you the same thing: its days are numbered. Why? Because it costs a fortune (think £35bn a year) and much of that fortune has historically been taken up by people who don't need incentives to save they're likely to be doing it anyway.
Note that 70% of pension tax relief goes to those in the higher rate tax brackets. That's why the minister of state for pensions, Steve Webb, wants to bring in a flat rate of pension tax relief of 30% to replace the current system whereby you get relief at your highest marginal rate of income tax.
That's something that would effectively give lower rate taxpayers a pay rise every time they saved, while limiting the benefits to higher rate taxpayers.
Subscribe to MoneyWeek
Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE
Sign up to Money Morning
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter
And it is why think tank the Pensions Policy Institute issued a report earlier in the summer entirely agreeing with the idea. However they added in a new twist a cap on the amount of money that can be taken tax-free on retirement.
At the moment, everyone can take 25% of their pension cash out as a lump sum, entirely tax-free. PPI would like to see that percentage reduced or simply capped at £36,000 for everyone.
I can see the arguments for all this the current relief system seems needlessly expensive. But the solutions on offer all seem bizarrely complicated when to me at least the solution is very simple.
If we must do something (and it appears we must always do something), why not just limit everyone to a certain level of pension tax relief by capping the amount of money that can be paid into a pension over a working lifetime?
We could get rid of the ludicrous life-time allowance system, which penalises people for investing well (see my previous posts on this) and instead cap contributions, and hence the cost of relief.
Think of the point of pension tax relief in the first place. It's to encourage people to save enough so that they won't be a burden on the taxpayer in their old age.
The priority of the system should then be to incentivise people to save that much inside a pension, but not to waste public money by incentivising them to do much more. Which brings us to the key question - how much is enough?
I've noted this before, but I suspect the answer is enough to generate an income of something in the region of £20,000, so around £4-500,000.
I accept that this isn't as straightforward as it sounds (you'd have to inflation link the limit and it would have to be firmly applied to public-sector pensions as well as private sector pensions), but it is an awful lot more simple and significantly cheaper than most of the other ideas on offer.
-
Ofgem proposes new energy tariffs with low or no standing changesStanding charges have invited public backlash as households battle high energy bills
-
Google shares bounce on Gemini 2.0 launchGoogle has launched the latest version of its Gemini AI platform, and markets have responded positively. Is it time to buy Google shares?
-
Beating inflation takes more luck than skill – but are we about to get lucky?Opinion The US Federal Reserve managed to beat inflation in the 1980s. But much of that was down to pure luck. Thankfully, says Merryn Somerset Webb, the Bank of England may be about to get lucky.
-
Rishi Sunak can’t fix all our problems – so why try?Opinion Rishi Sunak’s Spring Statement is an attempt to plaster over problems the chancellor can’t fix. So should he even bother trying, asks Merryn Somerset Webb?
-
Young people are becoming a scarce resource – we should value them more highlyOpinion In the last two years adults have been bizarrely unkind to children and young people. That doesn’t bode well for the future, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
Ask for a pay rise – everyone else isOpinion As inflation bites and the labour market remains tight, many of the nation's employees are asking for a pay rise. Merryn Somerset Webb explains why you should do that too.
-
Why central banks should stick to controlling inflationOpinion The world’s central bankers are stepping out of their traditional roles and becoming much more political. That’s a mistake, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
-
How St Ives became St Tropez as the recovery drives prices sky highOpinion Merryn Somerset Webb finds herself at the epicentre of Britain’s V-shaped recovery as pent-up demand flows straight into Cornwall’s restaurants and beaches.
-
The real problem of Universal Basic Income (UBI)Merryn's Blog April employment numbers showed 75 per cent fewer people in the US returned to employment compared to expectations. Merryn Somerset-Webb explains how excessive government support is causing a shortage of labour.
-
Why an ageing population is not necessarily the disaster many people think it isOpinion We’ve got used to the idea that an ageing population is a bad thing. But that’s not necessarily true, says Merryn Somerset Webb.
